Everything works pretty well out of the box, it never really overheats, Linux support required basically no effort with NixOS, the keyboard feels pretty nice, the screen is bright and easy to read, and fortunately I bought it when RAM prices weren't insane so I got the 64GB model.
I haven't tried repairing it yet but considering how well it's been working I'm not even sure I'll need ever need to. If this laptop gets stolen, I will likely just buy another ThinkPad, I'm a complete convert.
* "This isn't X. It's Y"
* "Some sentence emphasizing something. Describing the same thing with different framing. Describing it a third time but punchier.
* The em-dash of course
* A hard to describe sense of "cheesiness"
I only hope the models get good enough to not be so samey in the future.
By elevating ThinkPad T-series above other laptops by reputation, do iFixit weaken their notion of objective repairability ratings?
It was about a very fragile part of the process, and so it seemed like an error of omission that seemed atypical for iFixIt. It made me suspect the instructions might not have been wholly human written. I feel a bit vindicated for that suspicion.
The most generous interpretation I can have for this type of article is that it's a second-order phenomenon. If it was written by a human, it was written by one who consumes a lot of AI generated content and whose standards for what they produce have slipped.
Today I Learned about LPCAMM2, which is refreshing, seeing soldered-on memory always felt like some kind of slide into disposable barbarism.
[0] https://www.ifixit.com/News/95078/lpcamm2-memory-is-finally-...
> Going from a high score to the highest score isn’t usually about making minor tweaks. It requires fighting for every small, boring, consequential decision—the ones that determine whether a repair isn’t merely possible or practical, but within easy reach.
One thing which worries me, is how easily the Qualcomm core platforms run novel OS because I don't see indications they are avoiding blob dependency either in the core, or in peripheral control. It will probably be fine if you run the Lenovo tailored linux release, but if you want to run a BSD or something else you might find either you're on a slower path, or you have less battery life, or you simply can't drive some devices. (I am a user not a kernel/devicedriver developer so if I misunderstand blobbyness and why things like wifi cards often don't work please don't hate me)
But for hardware replacement? This is ace! I like the other sources which people use too, but Lenovo has a worldwide warranty, and has agents almost everywhere so your ability to be on-the-road, pick up a phone, quote a number and get a part is significantly enhanced. (in my experience)
I'm the current owner of a T14s (gen3 AMD) and the non-replaceable wifi chip has been my biggest pain point with it. I'm somewhat disappointed to see them give this 10/10 score with that problem unresolved.
according to lspci it's a Qualcomm QCNFA765 and it works great under Linux...until you suspend the machine. after it wakes up from suspend, it will only stay connected for a few seconds to a minute before dropping the connection and re-establishing it.
I've replaced wifi chips in other Thinkpads I've owned, so I naively assumed this would be the same as well - just swapping out the M.2 card. but no such luck, it's soldered in place.
I ended up using systemd to rmmod-then-modprobe the ath11k_pci module when the system resumes from sleep. this is annoying because it adds a delay of several extra seconds before the machine is ready to use, but none of the "smaller hammer" workarounds I attempted worked at all.
The only other device I've owned which might have that sort of longevity is my Fujitsu Stylistic ST-4110 (which I quite miss for its transflective display).
Really wish the Lenovo Yogabook 9i was in the ThinkPad line and that it had a Wacom EMR stylus....
10, Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 7 and T16 Gen 5
10, Framework Laptop 12
10, Framework Laptop 16
9, Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2
9, Lenovo ThinkPad 13w 2-in-1 Gen 3
9, Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 6
9, Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7
9, Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 3
9, Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 6
9, Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4
9, Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2
9, Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6
9, Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 5
9, Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3
9, Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5
8, Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 3
8, Microsoft Surface Laptop 7
7, Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 3
5, MacBook Air 13″ (M4)
5, MacBook Air 15″ (M2)
5, MacBook Air 13″ (M2)
5, MacBook Pro 14″ (M1)
4, MacBook Pro 14-inch (M5, 2025)
These seem to be all the models that have been evaluated. In older scorecard versions an HP EliteBook and a Dell Latitude have also achieved a 10https://www.ifixit.com/repairability/laptop-repairability-sc...
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1R_egXm7iwR0isCt_UxcG...
Not even an attempt to clear the ai smell out of this piece.
worldwide onsite service response times and parts availability are top notch as well.
The most annoying part is that the key matrix isn't set up to 3-key rollover with the copilot key like it would be for a real modifier key. (I'd assumed they'd just keep the matrix they used when there was a modifier in that spot. Nope.) Consequently, some key combinations, e.g. ralt-rcontrol-spacebar, don't work. Press them, nothing happens. Infuriating.
I think I'm going to cry...happy tears. :')
Feels like the old A31p in practical grunt but thinner and easier to maintain.
Tossed Kubuntu on it and every single piece of hardware was found and worked right out of the box. The hardware linux support has been fantastic.
That made me start looking into their scores. The Thinkpad E14 Gen 7 gets a 9/10 despite soldered ports, a pile of easily breakable plastic clips, a flimsy plastic case, and a riveted keyboard/top case assembly. To me that sounds _worse_ than the M5 MacBook Pro, which scores 4/10 (soldered storage unlike the E14, easily replaceable ports, and a riveted keyboard/top case assembly.) I would personally rather have replaceable ports than non-soldered storage, but putting my personal preferences aside, I think it’s hard to argue that difference between the two is worth going from a 4/10 to a 9/10.
The models I owned, or were work assigned, upgrading mem/disk was never an issue, the device could live until it died of motherboard issues, or similar non-upgradable components.
That said, I've owned them personally for 10+ years, so looking for objective thoughts outside repairability as the article covers.
From what I understand, Gen 2 was the last one to have S3, and newer versions with si0x will have higher power consumption in sleep mode, right?
[1]: https://www.ifixit.com/repairability/laptop-repairability-sc...
I replaced the batteries a few months ago and it was painless.
Whereas Lenovo laptops (non Thinkpads) from 2007 and 2021 are very solid nearly unbreakable.
I represent pricing in $/warranty year. (If you want me to believe the product is worth more, stand by it in the form of a warranty. But if a company isn't going to put their warranty where their mouth is, well.)
Lenovo used to warrant their product; my previous Thinkpad, which came with a then-pathetic (Thinkpads used to be four year warranties!) 3 year warranty, for ~$1200, or $400/warranty year.
I can't mock up a purchase for either laptop reviewed, as neither are available at any price. So, we'll do the predecessor. Those start at $1300/y; that represents an increase in price of ~14% YoY … which obviously is not tracking inflation.
That's enough to put smaller manufacturers who don't benefit from large supply chains, like Framework, in spitting distance.
But is it comparable? The base screen is "45%NTSC", and AFAICT from the reviews, the consensus is "don't do it". The other option is an sRGB screen. The base SSD is half the size now, but it is also upgradable to 1 TiB if you fork over $. The OS can be removed now, which actually knocks $90 off the "base" price! The dGPU is just quite literally gone. And nine years later, and the RAM is still the same size, but as we all know, software definitely hasn't gotten more bloated in the past nine years.
So, oddly, my current Thinkpad is down for the count right now. After 9 years, it suffered the first real HW failure: the motherboard. The first one took ~3 weeks to ship, and it was defective. The next one only took ~2 weeks, and the patient is still in surgery, so fingers crossed?
My biggest repairability question: … have they fixed the power brick to not have the cable melded into the brick? The cable is what breaks, and it costs probably like $3.50, but because it's molded into the main AC/DC converter brick, you have to scrap the entire thing and Lenovo charges for those like they're made from the tears of angels. If you just make a connector there, you raise the cost of the brick a few cents, maybe a few dollars … and save $50? $60 down the road in repairs, and untold amounts of eWaste.
Later, Framework send me a laptop in 1 week and later a replacement screen in less then a week. It's been 3 years ago now.
My only grievance is a bit buggy firmware. When I turn laptop on or reboot, speakers will randomly be muted (not a problem after OS boots, but for example in UEFI it'll either beep or not beep and that's random). UEFI interface was a bit buggy regarding mouse control, for example I've used to touch and drag things in boot order, but it didn't work and I have to actually press touchbar button down and keeping it like that move cursor. But touch drag works in other places. Not a big issue bit the first time I encountered it, I spent good few minutes trying to make sense of it, as I thought it just does not allow me to reorder boot entries or something like that. But these are small issues and once you've installed OS, you never deal with that.
Oh, and another complaint is that their BIOS update procedure is super weird. I have to find computer with Windows, download some exe, unpack things, find some BAT file and write to USB drive things, then boot from it. Theoretically they publish stuff to fwupd but I don't like this service. My best BIOS update experience was on Asus PC. I just put some bin file onto FAT32 USB drive, entered UEFI configuration, chose "update", selected that file and that's about it. Super easy, every manufacturer must implement this workflow.
Anyway I'm satistfied owner and my next laptop will likely be Thinkpad. Mostly because its stellar Linux support, but also because I didn't have any major issues with my current laptop.
My main requirement for a next laptop is running NixOS (coming from Macbook land). It’s probably this or one of the new XPS models, but not clear what NixOS support looks like there.
I'm glad I haven't let AI write much for me, its better for it to help me develop my ideas and writing and do the work to learn, explore and end up with something where my brain is in the gym. . Passive generation might not always map well to passive consumption
I find that Gemini uses that phrase way too much.
Why would you hope to be more easily fooled?
> "These are not complaints, merely observations."
> "There are repairable laptops, and then there are ThinkPads."
> "iFixit approached the relationship as collaborators, not critics."
> "[...] they didn’t declare victory and go home. They kept pushing."
> "Designing for repairability doesn’t mean compromising innovation or premium experiences; when done well, it actually drives smarter innovation, better modularity, and more resilient platforms."
> "It would be one thing to make a highly repairable but low-volume niche device or concept. Instead, Lenovo just threw down a gauntlet by notching a 10/10 repairability score on their mainstream-iest business laptop."
> "This is [...] how repair goes from being an enthusiast’s “nice-to-have” to being baked into procurement checklists and fleet-management decisions."
If the studies that say that humans prefer AI writers are to be believed then you'd be a fool not to
This is the "Reddit" factor. I picked up on it being LLM written with this sentence:
"This is the treacherous, final-boss stage where repairability usually dies,"
I’m no expert but it sounds plausible to me. From a manufacturing perspective, it makes sense that they’d want modular RAM so they can configure them at point of sale instead of having to manufacture multiple motherboards with only RAM sizes being different.
That is usually my concern with things like the modular ports and replaceable keyboards too. By the time I actually need to replace anything it could be 10 years from now, could I actually source these parts easily?
Regardless, that is a excellent problem to have compared to other less repairable laptops. I have been running my current laptop for 10 years, by the time it's unrepairable I might switch to this.
Regarding the T14 and T16, I'm frustrated that in my market (AU), they don't sell better screens than 1920x1200. I'd like to have a brighter 3k or 4k screen.
The LPCAMM2 seems to be limited to the Intel models, according to the pc mag article.
https://www.pcmag.com/news/lenovo-thinkpad-t14-gen-7-hands-o...
While most of the hardware works, hibernate doesn't, which annoys me. Fingerprint scanner also only works randomly at login, Linux issue I assume. Machine was crashing once a week (logs suggest it was AMDGPU related), but not since the firmware update, so fingers crossed that's fixed. In retrospect I wish I got the L14, didn't realize I would need more RAM at the time.
In the case of my ThinkPad, you can see there is literally no extra work required: https://github.com/NixOS/nixos-hardware/blob/master/lenovo/t...
Still, doesn't mean you shouldn't look into other brands, obviously. Take a look at that repo to see if there's obvious compatibility stuff.
Cool how memory converged on the same grid-of-pins solution as CPUs.
I imagine it will be kind of like USB-C. It's new and uncommon for a few years until suddenly everywhere you look has piles of it.
Edge connector RAM may one day be looked back on as "old style memory" like SIPP and DIPP is now.
I bought an internal and external battery and the external one quickly started bloating.
Yes exactly! To me it's surely the biggest win. It's very easy to break them when the power chord is plugged in. I'm really pleased that we will now be able to fix them without having to change the whole motherboard (which surely very few people do because of expansive and how ridiculous it sounds)
> Full disclosure: iFixit has an ongoing business relationship with Lenovo, and we are hopelessly biased in favor of repairable products.
A recent move saw India's leader break with BRICS to flag with West Asia Israel
I immediately switched it to Fedora and everything worked out of the box except the fingerprint reader which started working a few weeks later after a firmware update (also handled effortlessly/perfectly within Gnome - and it still gets updates!)
I've had the laptop for about two years now and it still runs just as well as the day I bought it. I'm very happy with it.
[1] No I will not stick with Windows. Please feel free to read through my comment history to see why, but TL;DR I just don't like it.
Then they give this Laptop a 10/10. One look at the internals and without a shadow of doubt it's not as as repairable friendly as framework laptop.
Not sure what they are smoking.
Yea someone else said it but bios updates on certain models can be hit or miss. But definitely better than dell or hp. I'd take Asus over Lenovo any day for bios though.
Presumably the smelly AI text problem is just ... a problem that will be solved. Or maybe we'll just get used to it.
Unless I'm reading for pleasure, I want everything in concise summaries. I don't need flowery language. Or even complete sentences.
Maybe an LLM verbosity slider that dynamically truncates text we don't need. I'll dial mine down.
What Lenovo pays us for: They send us devices. We score them and report internally on their repairability. Lenovo has actually made their repairability snapshot reports public, so you can see some of the documents we've given them, for instance: https://www.ifixit.com/Document/sunTY6dbbJvOMRjP/Repairabili...
What Lenovo doesn't pay us for: Any particular score (they've worked really hard for the 10/10). This blog post/press release.
There are other companies paying us for similar services, and most of them do not get 10/10s or glowing coverage on our site. Companies don't get any extra credit for working with us instead of providing repair in another way.
To be clear, our repairability scoring is an objective system that involves engineers taking apart dozens of devices in each category to calibrate each scorecard. Making a new scorecard takes us hundreds of hours. Giving a score to a product using that scorecard is also a time-consuming human thing, disassembling a product, building out a disassembly tree (like the one in the snapshot I linked above), turning the process into something legible to our spreadsheets.
M5 MacBook vs. ThinkPad E14 Gen 7, the ThinkPad wins on modular storage, modular memory, battery replacement is dead simple, it’s easier to get inside, and you only need a Phillips screwdriver and a pry tool for most common repairs. A lot of the concerns you bring up ("easily breakable," "flimsy") are matters of durability. We generally prefer clips over glues, and we didn't find the clips to be unusually breakable in our testing. Durability matters, but we try hard to separate it from repairability in our scoring. Assemblies and soldered ports absolutely played into why the E14 Gen 7 didn't get a 10/10.
Re: AI-generated prose... we do indeed use LLMs to support our small team of human writers when drafting content. That said, we don't publish anything without multiple humans reviewing. In this case, we were thorough in our human fact checking, but I agree we missed the mark on style.
But older Thinkpads (not sure about newer (~5 years old) ones, certainly not brand brand new models) have great support of alternative firmware such as coreboot and libreboot, other projects that disable Intel ME and the like.
(Typing this from a T14 gen 1.)
With OpenAI completely destroying the component supply chain in 2026 I think this requires citations
Basically right now my setup is super simple and restricted and I have to make it significantly more complicated and insecure to allow fwupd to work.
Thank you for replying, but that doesn’t answer the question. Why would you want to make made up bullshit output more tolerable to read? Being intolerable to read is a feature, it’s a useful signal to know a piece of text may not have had human review, and that you should spend your time reading something else.
I use that same strategy with website consent banners. If a website is so invasive that they go out of their way to make rejection hard (which, by the way, is against the law), I know it’s a company not worth supporting.
Almost every upgrade of firmware for my Lenovo laptop is CVEs recently. I have no doubts they share that with their government and keep some backdoors opened.
<in reference to hardware buttons in the spaceship control panel>
USA astronaut: "This is an American aircraft, you don't know the parts"
Russian astronaut: "Ah, American parts, Russian parts... all made in Taiwan!"
This new modular thinkpad will be crazy for refurb market, I wonder how is Lenovo going to prevent that eating into their sales. This probably means that corporate bulk purchases are majority of their sales and they don't fear to canibalize themselves which makes you wonder why they switched to soldered ram - incredibly unpopular move - at all.
Aside from that one dell laptop, though, I generally avoid HP and dell entirely, so perhaps that's why.
It's not acceptable on a high-end laptop nowadays (120hz minimum). Imagine the reduction in headaches, fatigue and nausea if we stopped tolerating this penny-pinching.
I don’t have the tools or skills to replace soldered on memory chips when they fail. Nobody at my place of work does. Nobody was doing that type of work in a warranty centre I worked in either.
I’d need to buy an entire motherboard which will much more expensive, and likely more time consuming, than swapping a couple of memory modules.
Bottom of the page
Anyway, every die? citation needed.
Also. If true, what's the alternative?
Like, no, we should absolutely not forget that, but the impact for me is low, and I prefer to have the superior hardware.
Was there some issue in customer support, or getting spare parts?
Is it about the new products that have since come out?
I'm also using a Framework notebook for the past two years and have been quite happy, but nothing needed replacement so far...
https://www.reddit.com/r/thinkpad/comments/bibx3p/t470s_supp...
We have probably 10 Thinkpads at the house. Three power bricks have been rendered useless (and four USB-C ports) because Lenovo has set their part selection and engineering design to "best value for the company" rather than "best quality for the end user".
Also, the PD negotiation of the Lenovo bricks is unusual, where it will not provide significant current at the 5 volt base USB power to some non-laptop devices and also not accept fast charging rates from some non-Lenovo chargers: Our ThinkPads will charge using some high-wattage smartphone chargers but not every one of them. Every once in a while we find a device with a USB-C charging port (e.g. baby monitor display) that will charge with any charger around the house but not with the Lenovo laptop charger.
The bad points: - The colored bezel is shit. - The way is open wasn't good for me and had to switch the hinges. Now I don't even think about it, but it was really bad before. - The 60W Power adapter doesn't last long and had to change it each year. Now I switch to the 180W. - The battery is ok but not exceptional
The good points: - The screen is very good (don't remember which one I choose, but not the first one, nor the last, I remember only 3 options so ...). - The compute power is quite good, I'm impressed about that. - Easy to clean, open it with the screwdriver, a little "Compressed air" on it, a little "Eyeglass Cleaner", and it's basically new. - The support was very very good. I had a defective screen kit. The ask me for photos, twice (two opinions from different people). Then conclude, like I already did, that it was an internal problem (but they have to verify I'm not responsible for the defect, that is normal) and send me a display kit free of charge. I had to send back the old on, free of charge too.
My first laptop was an IBM Thinkpad, and while it was a great piece of hardware, I don’t see myself ever buying another one as long an Lenovo owns the brand.
Edit: a link[1] for those that aren't familiar
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superfish#Lenovo_security_inci...
I've been using various Thinkpads for 10+ years and have yet to use this feature. But hey, to each his own :)
Editorial Note: We have consulted on repairable design of several Lenovo product lines, including the T14, and sell OEM parts for the ThinkPad, IdeaPad, and Yoga. Our scoring system evaluates products’ repair ecosystem (repairable design and availability of parts, tools, and information) and does not reward working with us over other ways of getting repair materials to customers.
There are “repairable” laptops, and then there are ThinkPad T-series laptops: the ones corporate IT buys by the pallet, images by the thousands, and expects to survive years of all-day use. During their lives they’ll weather countless commutes, on-the-go presentations, and inevitable splashes of coffee.
That’s why Lenovo’s newest ThinkPads are such a big deal: the new T14 Gen 7 and T16 Gen 5 score an eye-popping 10 out of 10 on our repairability scale. It’s the first time the T-series has ever earned our top rating. (The score is provisional, for now—we’ll finalize it when official parts and instructions become available through Lenovo’s support site, which we fully expect will happen in the near future.)
This moves past repairability as a niche feature for tinkerers. This is repairability showing up in the machine that practically defines the mainstream business laptop category.

Come on in, the repairability is fine. No, really—getting inside these new ThinkPads is a breeze.
Repairability at this level doesn’t happen overnight.
Two years ago at MWC 2024, Lenovo introduced a repairability-focused generation of ThinkPad T14 laptops that scored an already-phenomenal 9/10. Our Solutions team had been working directly with Lenovo during development—disassembling, evaluating, and feeding back what we found. Lenovo listened, iterated, and shipped a ThinkPad that looked familiar on the outside, but took some big repairability leaps forward on the inside.
And then Lenovo did the thing you want a product team to do when they see a big improvement: they didn’t declare victory and go home. They kept pushing.
Repairability forces better engineering discipline. It requires clarity, intentionality, and empathy for the people who will actually service and use the device over its lifetime.
—Christoph Blindenbacher, Director, ThinkPad Product Management
As Lenovo puts it, “Lenovo’s collaboration with iFixit began with a shared understanding that repairability was becoming a core element of product excellence, not just a customer requirement or a service consideration.” They wanted “an independent, trusted partner who could challenge our assumptions, validate our progress, and help us identify blind spots.”
They weren’t wrong about the “challenge” part.
Going from a high score to the highest score isn’t usually about making minor tweaks. It requires fighting for every small, boring, consequential decision—the ones that determine whether a repair isn’t merely possible or practical, but within easy reach. We cheered Lenovo on as they pushed beyond “great,” kept refining, and arm-wrestled every last tenth of a repairability point into submission.
This is the treacherous, final-boss stage where repairability usually dies, and Lenovo refused to give up.
Lenovo’s keyboard replacement procedure is about as easy as it gets.
Lenovo tells us, “The biggest challenge in getting to a 10/10 was balancing repairability with all the other expectations of a commercial device: performance, reliability, thermal efficiency, form factor, and design integrity. Repairability isn’t achieved by a single change: it requires many small, intentional decisions across the entire system, and each of those decisions can introduce trade-offs.
“One of the biggest challenges was shifting the mindset early in the design process. Serviceability is typically optimized later in development, often constrained by structural, material, or layout decisions that are already locked. To reach a 10/10, we had to bring those conversations forward and challenge long‑standing assumptions about what ‘good design’ really means. We addressed this by bringing design, engineering, service, quality, and sustainability together from day one.”
Modular LPCAMM2 memory makes a triumphant return, along with standard M.2 SSD storage.
From our perspective, the results speak for themselves. The new T-Series repair ecosystem is built around accessible, replaceable parts:
All of that is soon to be backed by official, publicly available repair documentation and a replacement parts pipeline designed for real-world service. Bravo, Lenovo.
Easy access to the battery and a modular cooling system help round out the new T-Series repairability scores.
10/10 is the highest repairability score we award, and the new T-series earns it.
That said, there are always ways to improve: making repairs faster, simpler, more forgiving, with fewer tool requirements and more components that can be swapped without escalating into a major teardown.

One of the biggest repairability wins: fully modular, individually replaceable Thunderbolt ports.
For example, Lenovo made the high-wear USB-C/Thunderbolt-side of things meaningfully better by going modular where it matters most. That alone is a huge win. But not every port on this machine gets the same fully modular treatment yet—some of the lesser-used I/O still lives on the main board or on a smaller breakout board, rather than being a quick-swap module on its own.
We noted a similar lack of modularity on the Wi-Fi module, where repairs or upgrades will be impractical at best. And while whole display assembly replacements are thankfully straightforward, there’s still a bit of adhesive to navigate if you want to drill into the display itself for a panel swap or a webcam repair.
These are less complaints and more acknowledgments that 10/10 doesn’t necessarily mean “perfection,” and our scorecard doesn’t capture every nuance of the repair experience. That’s exactly why we treat repairability as an ongoing practice, rather than a singular end goal.
To their credit, Lenovo seems to fully understand that distinction. They told us straight out: “10/10 isn’t the destination. From our perspective it’s the new baseline…. But the real opportunity is to go beyond the score. A perfect rating only matters if it leads to meaningful outcomes: quicker repairs, longer‑lasting devices, lower ownership costs, and less waste. Measuring success through customer experience and real‑world repair data will be just as important as external benchmarks. Ultimately, repairability will continue to evolve. As expectations, regulations, and technologies change, so must our approach.”
We couldn’t agree more, and we can only hope that other laptop makers are taking notes.
After going through this process, we wanted to know what Lenovo learned from their success (and what, we hope, other OEMs can emulate).
Designing for repairability doesn’t mean compromising innovation or premium experiences; when done well, it actually drives smarter innovation, better modularity, and more resilient platforms.
—Lenovo
Christoph Blindenbacher, director of ThinkPad product management, tells us, “This journey fundamentally changed my perspective from seeing repairability as a ‘nice-to-have’ or customer-driven requirement to recognizing it as a core pillar of good product design. Repairability forces better engineering discipline. It requires clarity, intentionality, and empathy for the people who will actually service and use the device over its lifetime.
“I also gained a deeper appreciation for the trade-offs involved. Designing for repairability doesn’t mean compromising innovation or premium experiences; when done well, it actually drives smarter innovation, better modularity, and more resilient platforms.”
We also asked if collaborating with iFixit for this process was an easy decision, or if it required winning over any internal stakeholders who might have been skeptical about the partnership. Christoph says, “Was there skepticism internally? Of course. Inviting an external expert into the development process, especially one known for being direct and uncompromising, naturally raised concerns. Teams worried about added complexity, design constraints, and the perception that we were exposing ourselves to criticism.
“What changed minds was the way the partnership actually worked. iFixit approached the relationship as collaborators, not critics. Their feedback was practical, grounded, and focused on helping us build better products. And once teams saw how early insights could prevent downstream issues and how small design decisions could significantly improve repairability without sacrificing performance, the value became clear. The new T-Series perfect 10/10 score is a direct reflection of that trust and shared commitment.”
If you want repairability to go mainstream, it has to show up where the volume is. Lenovo is the largest PC vendor worldwide, and the ThinkPad T-series is their commercial backbone: the “trusted workhorse” line that large organizations rely on every day, where downtime costs real money and productivity.
It would be one thing to make a highly repairable but low-volume niche device or concept. Instead, Lenovo just threw down a gauntlet by notching a 10/10 repairability score on their mainstream-iest business laptop.
This is how expectations change, and how repair goes from being an enthusiast’s “nice-to-have” to being baked into procurement checklists and fleet-management decisions.
Our compliments to Lenovo for pulling this off. We can’t wait to see what they do next.
Full disclosure: iFixit has an ongoing business relationship with Lenovo, and we are hopelessly biased in favor of repairable products.

AMD's PSP (now ASP) seems to be more of a local attack surface[2] that has its fair share of vulnerabilities.[3]
[1] https://www.franksworld.com/2025/09/18/the-intel-backdoor-no...
[2] https://www.digit.in/features/laptops/intel-me-and-amd-psp-t...
[3] https://www.amd.com/en/resources/product-security/bulletin/a...
Didn’t Dell and Sony have similar controversies?
But in today's market it's still one of the most simple to change batteries. And you know you can still purchase a genuine one, 4 years later for a reasonable price
OTOH unofficially T480 (not S) can work with two 32 GB SODIMMs. I did not try that.
(I wish the AMD-based thinkpads supported ECC RAM. Ryzen 7 mobile CPUs technically allow for that.)
I never really figured out how to get the discrete card working consistently, and since then I haven't bought a laptop with an Nvidia card.
I've had issues with wifi cards and sound drivers and the like as well, though it's going a lot better now than it was a decade ago.
I remember a Thinkpad BIOS update ended up destroying both undervolting and overclocking, and required a "chip-clip" programmer to revert.
99% of people will not be replacing the USB-C port, they'll just bin the device and buy a new one or live with a dead port. So the effort is 80% PR 20% actual usefulness.
Of the four I bought for employees. Two have had serious issues.
I guess I did “ have a specific bug that needs fixed”; I just didn’t know it!
I am waiting to jump ship to a different manufacturer, but nobody is challenging ThinkPad on keyboard quality/layout and Linux support, the two factors where I'm totally unwilling to compromise. (Tuxedo is close but still not the better alternative.)
(And I'm trying to avoid talking about microcode updates, which is a whole other story of fuckups)
Regarding Thinkpad BIOS: I have a Raspberry Pi Zero and a self soldered RP2040 programmer [1] in my travel kit for a reason. When travelling, a lot of the Cellebrite rootkits rely on an OEM BIOS, so they typically reflash your BIOS in the "we gonna check your laptop" phase.
[1] would totally recommend serprog, it's awesome: https://codeberg.org/Riku_V/pico-serprog
That being said, I really did have one bad stick of RAM once in my life, and it really does cause strange seemingly random problems.
Plus, no way to put more RAM/replace RAM with larger module if it's soldered on.
One time upgrading workstations, 4 of the 20 Corsair kits were sent for RMA. Those aren’t great odds.
I would guess that soldering them to the board reduces the points of failure, the slots can and do fail. However, I’ve also seen soldered components coming off as the cause of failures, but it is usually a part that gets hot combined with a design flaw.
I think making it impossible to upgrade is a somewhat bigger problem, at least while the machine is still in-warranty.
Traditionally, RAM has been one of the more-common upgrades to make as needs or budgets change, so soldering it in looks like planned-obsolescence.
I love that they have way less thermal throttling than the X1 I had before
It's a real problem that BIOS updates for consumer systems never come with a meaningful changelog, so evaluating whether a particular update is a good idea or not is basically impossible.
I generally have it always plugged in, but it's not great.