The conspiracy about GM killing the EV1 is very hyperbolic and the documentary is mostly a fantasy.
Carmakers releasing test cars to markets and then destroying them was a common practice - GM did the same with their hydrogen cars, the famous turbine engine cars, and even large scale prototypes like the Aerovette. In many cases they were only able to circumvent safety/testing regulation because these were not registerable cars.
Even if the market tests were successful, the only placed they planned to sell them was California as a compliance car for CARB. No matter how you try to spin it, a lead-acid battery powered car was not ever going to be the car of the future.
In the past, they would have wanted the motors disabled and the batteries incapacitated (if they weren't already, because half of them were trash), if they couldn't legally scare you into letting them scrap the car.
I kindof feel like there's some ulterior motive, like they want another museum piece for themselves, or sales are really hurting and they want to drum up some good will. Call me skeptical if you must, but they _really_ didn't want these on the road.
Sounds line GM is taking credit for EV industry’s success after they recalled and sent to the crusher the very car model these people are trying to restore.
Interesting… if removing subsidies has caused Ford to write off 20 billion and Honda to announce they took a 15 billion dollar loss mainly on EVs… maybe something is wrong?
I’m in this industry, it’s going to get worse. We’re looking at 2034 vehicles now, and surprise, they’re ICE.
Everybody who thinks that we need heavy-handed mandates and to fully eliminate ICE vehicles is just setting themselves up for disappointment.
BrightDrop's dead, the Bolt was loved and killed and brought back and killed again, they keep making questionable decisions with their infotainment and subscription models (no CarPlay, mandatory consumer Google Account and OnStar subscriptions), the best thing they even apparently sell right now has a Honda (re)badge on it...
And GM could have crushed all of them, but apparently was proud enough of it and not afraid people would ‘discover its secrets’ and build a new EV, since they decided to just park a half dozen or whatever at schools for students to poke and prod at. I get that the optics of crushing them made them look like a villain from the “Captain Planet” cartoon, but it would have been foolish for them to do anything else.
I don't think there's anything nefarious here, they are just cultivating a particular image to try to sell cars. It's a reasonable marketing strategy, as marketing strategies go.
In this case, they took advantage of the fact the car was abandoned in Georgia and went to impound action, which let them buy it from the State with title, bypassing any potential agreement with GM.
I'm a huge fan of the Bolt, and I love my 2019. It's a very practical car, and has surprisingly decent range.
Yes. These people can literally not fucking help themselves.
I personally see it as a pettiness and weak character that they cannot let ideology drop from the foreground even for a second.
Again, I’m in this industry. There was a marketing push because they saw a way to easily sell new and second cars even to people it doesn’t work for. Marketing pushed so hard that there’s an equal pushback from reality.
Nothing to do with Elon or Trump.
I do wonder what the outlook for that is now, they were supposed to be a shorter term bridge until Honda had their own EVs but Honda recently killed a bunch of EV plans so maybe the GM partnership sticks around a while?
https://insideevs.com/news/785214/2027-chevrolet-bolt-limite...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_battery_electric_vehic...
> The EV1 introduced technologies that remain foundational to modern EVs
Do you know how many more EVs would be adopted if they weren't marketing iPads-on-wheels to the masses? It's the biggest hindrance to the industry behind lack of charging infra.
I agree the comment seemed out of place and I’m speculating about why they put it in, but that’s one reason I would do so. Someone who does a Nazi salute on TV with a bizarre smile on his face is not just another business guy.
Lee Iacocca didn’t get those comments.
I feel I want every car to have native google maps now.
It's eternally fascinating that people can't or won't grasp that the cars cost far more to produce than they could put them to market for, instead deciding that it was a big conspiracy.
It took until ~2015 for batteries to become practical for expensive mass market cars.
CarPlay does this on my F150 Lightning. It manages state, preconditioning when routing to a charging stop, will suggest charging stops as I'm routing, etc. etc.
There's really nothing special about GM's implementation IMO, except that they charge you monthly to access it.
tl;dr You're right :)
I am not an expert but I believe that US regulations require that manufacturers make a range of vehicle types to sell on the US market. You don't need to sell a lot of, say, compact cars - but you need to offer a compact car in order to sell your cash-cow large trucks.
Oh, and everyone who couldn't afford an EV complained about the subsidies.
The easiest way to make EVs more attractive is taxing carbon.
Android Auto is where you can connect your phone to the car and your phone projects onto the car's display with apps and navigation.
Android Automotive is when the car itself is running Android Automotive for its infotainment OS, meaning it has access to a limited Android App Store to install apps natively into the car's infotainment system and you can sign in with your Google account.
Some cars with Android Automotive also support CarPlay and Android Auto on top of it, but GM has decided to disable those features, meaning you have to use the built-in Android Automotive system to manage your media streaming apps and pay GM for the data access plan.
The EV1 was a evaluation exercise/hedge against regulation; the impetus was a lunatic assertion in 1990 by the CA gov't: they wanted 10% of cars sold in the state by 2000 to be electric. Nobody outside of Sacramento thought this would be doable, but it was an excuse to do some useful R&D, as well as to demonstrate to lawmakers the difficulties involved.
As for the Prius-the Gen I Toyota Hybrid Synergy Drive cost $380 million in 1990s dollars for R&D. Anybody at GM trying to spend that kind of money on an experimental(!) powertrain for a low-volume(!!) economy(!!!) car would've been fired. At Toyota, Shoichiro Toyoda was supportive of such an idea, despite the limited opportunity for near-term profit; and if you have that last name at that company, nobody's gonna fire you.
I use the past tense because the Trump admin has gotten rid of the fines for this regulation so it basically doesn't matter anymore (one of the few good moves it's done). It'll be interesting to see if small cars are able to make a recovery in the US, or if it's too late.
This is the one that I saw: https://evplay.io/shop/ev-play-lite-gm
It's kind of expensive, and there's a non-zero chance that GM does something to block it.
If GM tries to block it there are a number of ways a lawyer can fight back and likely win. The Magnuson Moss warranty act was historically written about car radios for starters. There are other consumer protection laws as well. You need a good lawyer, but I suspect they will take the case for the expected gains in the return lawsuit. If I were them I'd get a lawyer to write this up in a "white paper" - It would be a few thousand, but it is also something GM will likely see if they think about doing anything.
When the demand is sufficient, the cars will be sold in numbers to match it. Demand will increase as it becomes practical to own an EV for more people. This mainly has to do with charging infrastructure at every level, which is capital intensive for both individuals and governments.
A battered GM EV1 that turned up at a Georgia impound lot and sold at auction for more than $100,000 has sparked a restoration project that brought together a YouTube channel, a private collector, and ultimately General Motors itself. GM announced the news on March 11, 2026.
The car was VIN 212, one of the rarest surviving examples of the EV1, the first modern purpose-built electric vehicle from a major automaker. GM leased roughly 1,000 of them starting in late 1996, later recalled them, and left only a handful of non-drivable examples in museums and universities. VIN 212 slipped through the cracks.
Private enthusiast Billy Caruso purchased the car at auction, then teamed up with his father Big Mike, fellow enthusiasts Daren and Freddie Murrer, and Jared Pink, founder of Questionable Garage, a YouTube channel known for deep, engineering-forward restorations. The group had previously collaborated on a Chevrolet S-10 electric, a vehicle that shares drivetrain technology with the EV1. Together they launched Project V212 with a clear, ambitious goal: return VIN 212 to driving condition and public visibility by November 2026, the 30th anniversary of the EV1’s introduction.

(Image: GM)
When the team began publishing restoration videos, GM President Mark Reuss was watching. GM invited the Questionable Garage crew to its Global Technical Center in Warren, Michigan, where parts carefully pulled from a donor EV1 by GM’s design fabrication team were handed over. The visit included on-camera conversations with GM Heritage Center experts Adam King and Kevin Kirbitz, who walked the team through heritage vehicles that led to the EV1, including the Electrovair II, the Sunraycer solar race car, and the Impact concept.
GM technicians also showed off their own EV1 project, a recommissioning of a very special example, EV1 No. 1. The visit also featured a battery evolution walkthrough with Kurt Kelty and Andy Oury, two engineers helping to define GM’s EV future, and a cameo from Reuss, who escorted the crew across campus to collect their parts.
GM confirmed it is formally supporting the restoration as part of its recognition of the EV1’s 30th anniversary. The EV1 introduced technologies that remain foundational to modern EVs: heat pumps for climate and battery thermal management, blended regenerative and friction braking, fully by-wire controls, low-rolling-resistance tires, and an aluminum space frame chassis. As GM’s team put it: “EV1 set in motion everything we’re doing in electric right now.”
Today GM spans EVs across Chevrolet, GMC, and Cadillac, and is developing next-generation battery chemistries, expanding public charging infrastructure, and advancing V2H and V2G technologies that turn EVs into energy assets for homes and communities. The Questionable Garage team is continuing to document every step of Project V212 on YouTube, with more visits to GM facilities planned.
Before electric vehicles became a serious industry, General Motors built the EV1. It was 1996, and no major automaker had ever done anything quite like it: a purpose-built, ground-up electric vehicle, not a conversion, not a concept, but a production car designed from the first bolt to run on electricity.
GM leased roughly 1,000 of them, mostly in California and Arizona, to a small and intensely devoted group of drivers. The EV1 was quick, quiet, aerodynamically radical, and packed with technology that the rest of the auto industry would not catch up to for decades. Engineers were essentially inventing the modern EV in real time.
Then GM recalled every last one of them and sent most to the crusher.
That decision, and the fury it sparked among EV1 lessees who fought to keep their cars, is the subject of Chris Paine’s 2006 documentary “Who Killed the Electric Car?” It is essential viewing for anyone interested in how the auto industry, oil companies, regulators, and consumer culture shaped the trajectory of electric transportation. Paine does not let anyone off the hook easily, and the film holds up as both a piece of investigative storytelling and a snapshot of an industry at a crossroads.
We are seeing the administration try the same tactics now in 2025 and 2026 to kill EVs, but EVs are now too widespread and too mainstream to be killed. The administration’s foolish actions will increase harmful smog, worsen air pollution, undermine climate progress, and cost drivers more money over time.
Five years later, Paine returned with “Revenge of the Electric Car,” following the early days of Tesla (before Elon Musk went crazy), the Nissan Leaf program, and GM’s development of the Volt as the industry reversed course and dove back into electrification. Where the first film is a eulogy of sorts, the second is a comeback story. Together they function as a two-part chronicle of one of the most consequential pivots in automotive history, and are essential viewing for any EV enthusiast.
The EV1 did not die without leaving something behind. The engineering lessons it generated compounded quietly over the years that followed. Now it stands as an important piece of automotive history. In January 2022, I wrote When the EV1 Was Killed, Plug In America was Born, one of EVinfo.net’s first articles.
EVinfo.net is glad Questionable Garage and GM are restoring VIN 212. We can’t wait to see it cruising America’s roads.
