If 100y is the difference it could just be that the tree grew for 100y and the at the end they used it?
https://www.tanumworldheritage.se/rock-carving-facts/?lang=e...
Tree ring databases are pretty good. I think they cross calibrate to radio carbon maybe.
As for boats, the Viking age has been connected with acquiring sail technology, not so much with boats as such (which have existed for a long time, the rock carvings you linked to show depictions of boat designs which have actually been found in archeological digs, and that indicates that older, different carvings are also true and that boats were used for long distance trade and expeditions a millenium or two, at least, before the Vikings).
If the appearance of efficient sail technology really coincided with the beginning of Viking raids is still in the open I believe.
Then the media will turn around and print something absolutely outlandish based on a total hypothesis, just because it attracts clicks.
This site suggests "Germanic groups such as the Saxons, Franks, and Frisians". That seems like the more parsimonious explanation.
More... than what? What do you think Vikings are?

Herlaugshaugen (in the centre foreground) from the west, looking towards the strait and the mainland in the background (photograph by Hanne Bryn, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology). Credit: Antiquity (2026). DOI: 10.15184/aqy.2026.10330
Monumental ship burials in Scandinavia may have started around a century earlier than previously thought, according to a paper published in the journal Antiquity. It reports the discovery of the remains of a 1,300-year-old ship buried on the Norwegian island of Leka, predating the Vikings.
The burial was found inside a massive earth mound known as Herlaugshaugen, which has long been thought to be the grave of a legendary king from local sagas. Large burial mounds are fairly common across northern Europe, although only some contain ship remains.
Scientists usually don't dig up these kinds of large mounds because it is expensive and risks damaging the site. So, instead, the Norwegian team dug small trenches in specific areas of the mound to look for clues.
They also used metal detectors. If a ship had been buried here, the iron rivets that once held the vessel together would be in their original positions even after the wood had rotted away. The team eventually retrieved 29 iron rivets. Radiocarbon dating of the wood attached to the rivets indicated a burial date around AD 700.

Sommerschild’s map from 1780 georeferenced over lidar data from 2012 (from Stamnes Reference Stamnes2015: fig. 7; illustration by Arne Anderson Stamnes, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology). Credit: Antiquity (2026). DOI: 10.15184/aqy.2026.10330
"The Herlaugshaugen mound represents a ship burial dating to the end of the seventh or the beginning of the eighth century," wrote the team in their paper.
The significance of this is that conventional theories hold that monumental ship burials began earlier in England (for example, the famous ship burial at Sutton Hoo, which dates to the early seventh century) and that the practice moved to Norway around AD 800. This was around the time that the Viking Age started. However, this research suggests that this tradition appeared in Scandinavia earlier than previously believed.
In other words, large seagoing ships that could travel long distances, which we associate with the Vikings, were already in use some time before they were on the scene. It also says something about social hierarchy at the time.
Building such a huge mound is a monumental feat, so to speak, that required massive amounts of labor. And most likely only powerful kings or chiefs could have commanded the groups of people and resources needed for such a project.

Clinker nails from trench A (photograph by Freia Beer, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology). Credit: Antiquity (2026). DOI: 10.15184/aqy.2026.10330
The find also suggests that ship burials were already linked with elite status by the year 700.
"The monumental ship mound at Leka represents another piece of the puzzle for understanding the societal development of northern Europe in the seventh to tenth centuries AD," said the researchers.
Written for you by our author Paul Arnold, edited by Gaby Clark, and fact-checked and reviewed by Robert Egan—this article is the result of careful human work. We rely on readers like you to keep independent science journalism alive. If this reporting matters to you, please consider a donation (especially monthly). You'll get an ad-free account as a thank-you.
Geir Grønnesby et al, The Herlaugshaugen ship burial: closing the gap between the East Anglian and Scandinavian ship burial traditions, Antiquity (2026). DOI: 10.15184/aqy.2026.10330
© 2026 Science X Network
Citation: Monumental ship burial beneath ancient Norwegian mound predates the Viking Age (2026, April 16) retrieved 20 April 2026 from https://phys.org/news/2026-04-monumental-ship-burial-beneath-ancient.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.