1. A kind of capital that is widely available, so that people could exercise control and agency with machines that do what you want them to do for your own needs.
2. A distribution tool controlled by mega-corporations as they decide what you should be able to see or have.
I worked on a Geocities archive restoration. There was a boat load of porn (including illegal porn), malicious domains, spamvertising, malware, predators, political extremists, etc on the 1999 web, and you can find all of it within the raw Geocities archive that was made before it shut down. The idea that the old web was some kind of pure place of innocence is a weird and factually inaccurate take. If anything, the late 90s web was more dark than it is now, perhaps in part because nobody had any idea of how to police anything on it and things like PhotoDNA didn't exist yet.
If anything, my work on 90s site archival has taught me that the web has always been a place with a lot of dark places, and the narrative that the old web was some sort of pure innocent place that became evil is not matched by evidence.
It's just as plausible to me that the general "misbehavior" of humans on the internet hasn't changed all that much, but that we have, frankly, adopted a more puritanical and intolerant approach towards it. Nobody was talking about getting rid of Section 230, carding people for 18+ before they could use IRC (or install an operating system, what the actual fuck is wrong with you California), and Congress wasn't dragging evil Geocities CEO David Bohnett into grilling sessions where they were accusing him of hooking kids on digital cigarettes. Perhaps it would be wise to have a little nostalgia for some of that too.
The issue isn't javascript, it's ads/trackers/algos/slop. I feel like tracker/ad/algorithm free static site on the status quo of http, or something newer like IPFS, is worlds better than trying to use arbitrary restrictions on something like a Gemini capsule.
Then buy a Totalfark subscription so they don't need to bend over backwards to show more ads just to keep the lights on. See ya there!
Instagram is probably my most used one these days and I love seeing my friend's stories and I don't think I've parsed more than a handful of ads in the last 2 or 3 years that I've been an active user, probably a few tens of hours wasted with dumb reels, not a bad cost at all imo. I have probably 400 irl people and 200 internet accounts I follow. It doesn't have the charm and honesty of navigating a webring or whatever, but the friction is so low so I get to see a lot of stuff my friends, acquaintances and especially just people i'm peripherally in community with share that I probably wouldn't otherwise.
I miss the old internet for sure, but I'm not convinced the current situation is as horrible as people say.
What made the old web cool, is that it was the first time we can communicate with so many random people in far away places digitally and share information through cool web pages.
That novelty has mostly died now. Communicating with people in distant lands is mundane now. And there is little new things to share that we haven’t already seen or heard before.
So what’s the point of the web now? Maybe the internet will become purely a utility for exchanging data for infrastructural and business purposes, and the idea of using the internet as a source of entertainment or recreation will fade away.
It would be nice to retreat back to an analog world, where the internet still exists, but only as a layer of glue in the background that orchestrates multiple technologies that power our world, and nothing more.
Personally, I prefer the Internet of the 1990's. Part of that was the novelty and excitement. That led to a lot more experimentation. Part of that was the accessibility of the information that did exist. There was less wading through crap to simply find something, and the useless stuff that did exist tended to be easy to detect. (A lot of it was simply: I have an ambitious idea for a website but, Under Construction!) Most of all, the diversity was easier to access.
Today's Internet is much more polished and much more is available. Yet a lot of it is also siloed behind accounts, paywalls, or is a profit project rather than a passion project. That's not to say there is anything wrong with profiting off of good work, but there is a lot of people putting up low quality junk either because they don't realize how much effort is involved or because they are trying to make a quick buck.
In order to actually have and maintain a healthy balance of life and technology, such compromises are required.
No argument there. That said, I think the big difference between the 1990's and today is that everyone knew the nefarious places and people existed but, for the most part, you actually had to seek it out. I am not suggesting that it was hard to find. Perhaps the worse of the worse was easier to find. On the other hand, it wasn't quite the same thing as algorithmic feeds. For example: I absolutely refuse to view anything remotely political on some sites (including reputable news sources or material that is clearly satire) since that is the surest way to be fed extremist crap. How far those feeds will 5ake me, I simply do not want to know.
And today, if you want to learn something the right way, you probably still should buy a book (or, I guess, pirate an ebook). I don't think you can really learn much from YouTube influencers and the like.
Without that context, it all falls flat, I agree.
I've considered trying to make a speed-of-light-ping-limited BBS that can _only_ be connected to by actual-locals, but reality is harder. (And the moment it got popular, nefarious actors would just rent or compromise a box in-radius.)
I compiled some old web meta links here: https://outerweb.org/blog/web-discovery.html
1) wasn't supposed to be unlimited but the ISP didn't bother to mesure it until sometime in 2000
Can we get the best of 1999 with the best of 2026? Probably not...
But otherwise totally agree with the critique. Modern connection speeds have enabled a huge amount of bloat. I grew up when 1200 baud modems were the latest rage, and patience when downloading was a hard requirement.
Although, being patient was part of the experience as well
This early access + a 4x SCSI CD burner made me one of the 2 official warez provider at school. I was even taking orders from parents of friends.
And it could easily have been 10 KB.
So hardly anyone considered facebook to be a part of "the web". It was its own weird duck. Twenty years later and most people only frequent this "weird" part of the internet - this limited ensemble of paid and unpaid walled gardens.
Most of my articles are pretty media rich and weigh in between 1-2 megs. I do try to be pretty conscientious about asset compression (mozjpeg, h264 for video, etc.). I'd love to switch over to AV1 but I've heard compatibility on older devices is spotty.
I was just thinking back the other day about BBS days and how frustrating a busy signal could be, or connection time limits, etc.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bit_rate
Secondly, that 10 Mbps was only your downstream signaling rate.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_signaling_rate
Was your upstream via analog dialup?
So what's the real story behind your piddlly little town getting bleeding edge cable internet service? (Or was it somewhere like Los Gatos?)
I'd also note that the Internet of 1999 was loaded with spam, bursting at the seams with it, so much so that it was actually a big deal when ~30 months later Paul Graham wrote a post about Bayesian filtering.
I propose building a new stack, without ICANN and friends (Verisign is raising .com prices yet again). I'm planning to build it[1] at some point, just working on other foundational stuff at the moment.
Cozy corners, webrings, and Gemini/Gopher is where I see the spirit of the old web alive and well.
---
[1]: https://dap.sh
Today is Friday. Send out a group text right now. Saturday evening. Bring whatever. We'll order pizza, it'll be a good time. Make it happen.
Logistically: One was specifically focused on the CDROM era. Any game that shipped on CD or came out roughly 1995-2005 was fair game, and the organizers mentioned a few by name that you might want to pre-install. The other was anything-goes, networking optional; I brought a TI 99/4A and a handful of cartridges, and it was very popular, apparently that grabbed a bunch of folks right in the childhood, in between rounds of Quake.
The only thing missing was the Josta. RIP.
Needless to say, I got accused of cheating quite a bit.
> In 1994, BookLink Technologies featured tabbed windows in its InternetWorks browser.[citation needed] That same year, the text editor UltraEdit also appeared with a modern multi-row tabbed interface. The tabbed interface approach was then followed by the Internet Explorer shell NetCaptor in 1997. These were followed by several others like IBrowse in 1999, and Opera in 2000 (with the release of version 4 - although an MDI interface was supported before then), MultiViews October 2000, which changed its name into MultiZilla on April 1st, 2001 (an extension for the Mozilla Application Suite[11]), Galeon in early 2001, Mozilla 0.9.5 in October 2001, Phoenix 0.1 (now Mozilla Firefox) in October 2002, Konqueror 3.1 in January 2003, and Safari in 2003. With the release of Internet Explorer 7 in 2006, all major web browsers featured a tabbed interface.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tab_%28interface%29
Also, Opera had a Multiple-Document Interface from the start, so 1995 or so. That's not "tabs" per se but multiple mini-windows inside the main window; much the same "Hey, I can have multiple things open!" deal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Opera_web_brows...
My point is, you think more about clicking a link when it'll monopolize your whole UI and you can't just stash it in a background tab or mini-window.
Go back to the first tab which has finally finished loading. Consume.
[gestures wildly at all the bots in 2026]
It meant I cared _less_ about page load time, even on dialup, because they were happening in other windows. I could happily tolerate a 2-minute load time as long as the first page took more than 2 minutes to read.
I know nostalgia for the old days is de rigueur especially on HN but I definitely do not want to go back to that.
yes, they were, in the UK at least. speaking as a compuserve user.
Today, my computer's memory is far more constrained than its network bandwidth. I find it very easy to accidentally open tons of tabs very quickly (esp. from the HN front page!) until suddenly the browser is swapping and everything's slowing to a crawl trying to process all those new page DOMs.
And yet, even when it doesn't choke the computer, I find no real benefit to preloading pages in the background any more. At least on my connection, the page load time after I focus a tab is almost imperceptible.
How things have changed!
Some of the most popular boards had minimum connect speeds; if you couldn't connect at at least 9600 or 14.4k, it would immediately hang up on you, for this reason.
Personally I never used cix but one of the magazines (pc pro?) has columnists on it at least.

If you only use social media and video hosting frontends - getting fed by algorithms and visiting the same 5 sites everyday on constant doomscroll, then the internet has never been alive for you. That experience is perhaps ~3-5% of what the internet could be.
For the vast majority of people, yes - the internet is dying: living inside an algorithmically controlled echochamber that they will never get out of, they live and die by what they are “supposed to see”. But, it does not have to be like this.
With the influx of slop that will be created (and already has been created) with LLMs, there is an ever increasing signal to noise on these platforms. This obviously means that we will see less depth of content, less interesting information, and less of the human - all of these are not positive things in any regard.
I had the displeasure of scrolling the tiktok feed on desktop for 30 seconds the other day, and it is a wonder to me how some of us have any attention span left at all. The content was designed to literally suck your soul from your body. AI generated “fruit love island” - It was too much for me. I shook my head and closed the browser tab.
We can use the internet as it was actually intended to be used: go to the protocol layer to interact with the data at it’s source. Throw off the facade of the modern social platform, and we start to see that freedom of information is within grasp.
The only way to actually use the internet in a way that is going to be beneficial to you is to disregard much of it. Using technologies from yesteryear, we can solve the problems we face today on the modern advertisement riddled, javascript focused, LLM slop, distracting, pointless, attention-seeking, corporate hellscape that is the web.
I believe the time is now (and has always been) to use the internet like it’s 1999.
In 1999, the internet was figuring itself out. There was no social media, no algorithm, hell, Google was just starting up. Only about 4% of the world’s population was online (compared to almost 75% today). But, I am not going to suggest we all log off and touch grass (though we should be doing more of that!) My thesis is that we must return to being citizens of the web, instead of users in some database - we must reclaim agency over our attention, and the technologies presented in the 90s and early 2000s allow us to do just this.
This was by constraint more than by design, but the idea behind how the internet should be used is what we are looking to re-instill. The HTTP, XMPP/IRC, email (SMTP) etc. protocols are genuinely good, hence their staying power. The perversion of the protocol is what we are directly assaulting here, the frontend and platform portion of the upper layer 7 (ironic Cloudflare link, as their monopoly is also against the principles we will discuss). The browser used to work for you instead of actively subverting your security and privacy with hundreds of tracking cookies and scripts on every page load.
The internet was (and never stopped being) a series of tubes that transmits data. That data is accessible and transparent to anyone, and the way we ingest, manipulate, and work with said data is that which we can change to benefit the individual. Let’s discuss.
I have largely embraced RSS feeds as the only way to follow blogs/news/video creators/etc. as I don’t want an algorithm to feed me content. I want to make the decision for myself as to what it is that I actually care to consume, and that should not be content that is meant to make the platform the most amount of ad revenue by emotionally manipulating the viewer into spending more time scrolling.
Nor should anything I look at be LLM generated slop: the moment I find something that crosses my desk which starts with “it’s not this, it’s THIS”, I immediately click off and move on. I want real people, real creators, and real content in my feed, not LLM slop. I have found no better way to “curate reality” better than this.
If you only take one suggestion from this article, this would be it: Setup miniflux, find feeds of creators and persons you enjoy following, add their feeds to miniflux, and sit back and relax as the content now comes to you.
We have a budding community on IRC that I think is far more interesting than most online communities I have seen simply because of the (small) barrier to entry that is IRC. Internet Relay Chat has been around since the late 80s, and it is still a protocol which is simply plain text - meaning higher signal to noise (see the pattern?) than a platform that allows images, video, “upvotes”, and the like.
XMPP is an enhancement on IRC in more modern ways, and is the protocol on which many of the major chat applications are built. But, it is best when you host it yourself for you and your friends to participate in group chats and direct peer to peer conversation. Using OMEMO encryption (support now in jabber.el in emacs!) allows you to have end-to-end encryption between parties, and encryption lives on the server, so even hosts can’t really see the conversation. Nice.
Note on Element/Matrix: I don’t recommend using the Matrix protocol. It doesn’t solve anything over and beyond XMPP/IRC and I don’t personally trust it. Plus electron app - no thanks
You can negate much of the slop du jour by using your own search engine, as well as using my small guide on how to use search engines. They are still powerful, they still get you the information you need, but you cannot use them how the 99% does. You have to actually search with intention, using them methodically and professionally. You will not get good results from “learn go programming” but will get much better results from “before<2025> net/http go language”. Ask better questions, get better results.
A large problem with the internet has always been link rot - where a bookmark or link that you liked is gone tomorrow because of one of various reasons. You can and should download useful information locally to keep for posterity. I have a function in my emacs configuration to do just this, shipping content to a syncthing controlled directory, to push content across my devices, including my phone (which doesn’t have a browser). You can also use the Internet Archive’s link tool for creating backups that will live on their servers.
When people DM me on various platforms, I generally just tell them to email me. I know it is annoying for most, but the reason is well merited: by chatting on platforms, you and I do not own the conversation. Worse, that conversation is likely being monitored and parsed so that we can be encouraged to consoom product at a later date. I’d rather just talk to you directly.
Email is a point of contact that is not being farmed for keywords by platforms to then serve us ads (you’re not using gmail, right?). Those that know me, have my email or phone number, those that don’t, could very easily. But - the friction point of writing an email and sending it is too much for many people, and is a natural filter.
PGP is a great way to make sure your email is read only by those that you intend to read it. Use it.
You can find my public key here.
Most people consume feeds on social media, and while I would rather not use socials at all, the fact of the matter is that we can spread the good word via social media, using it as a push platform, not to pull. So, I use APIs and tools to get content out on social media platforms. I don’t consume social media, nor do I spend more than ~5 minutes per week on it (only answering DMs by giving out my email/phone mostly).
There is a tenet of the IndieWeb called POSSE - You own the content as it is on your own platform, and then you ship it to other locations to increase your reach. I would recommend doing this.
In addition to the IndieWeb, we can look to the SmolWeb for some inspiration as to how to use the internet. Both protocols are tremendously light and focus on text as the primitive for all communication. Gemini is newer and a bit of a middle finger to the modern web, whereas Gopher is the old guard. While I would agree with some of the sentiment that Gemini is solutionism, it is still interesting to see what can be done when we take text and make it the focus of a platform.
However, I think that http is not the villain, not by a long shot - it is just how we treat it. Instead of bloating up Chrome tabs to hundreds of megs (that is more than some linux distributions), we could be expanding upon it and building out something that focuses on the good that the web can do. So, while a fun aside, I don’t spend a ton of time on Gopher or Gemini these days.
On your router, you can and should setup blocklists for various malicious and nefarious domains, advertisements, adult content, etc. This is not “1999-esque” in practice, but is a requirement for the modern web.
I recommend using a text only browser, but if you do use a regular browser, then disabling javascript and using ublock origin are both recommended mitigations.
Don’t use social media as a consumer, don’t argue with people online, and generally seek out information and interesting people which leads us to…
Finally, I only want to promote, consume, and talk with real humans. Using the internet as if it were the 90s or early 00s means focusing on the human, because nowadays the internet is not real, it is a figment of our collective imaginations as to what we think is real. It is an ugly place if we are not careful to be deeply intentional with that which we watch, read, and listen to.
But, I am still a bloomer when it comes to the internet at large, but we have been doing our very best collectively to make it worse since the inception (give or take) of Facebook.
Authenticity is in short supply and seems to be the only way forward, for so much of what we see is manufactured, tailored, and designed to show something that doesn’t exist. Imperfection is the mark of the human, the spelling mistakes, the last minute word addition because you misspoke on a video, it’s all more real because of this. We can strive to glorify the Creator with creation, and that will always be more enjoyable than the sterile veil over what could be authentic.
The internet as it was conceived was perhaps humanity’s greatest achievement and has created so much good. It has taken people out of poverty, it has given us information on topics of any and all kinds. I would not be the person I am today without it, as I have made great friendships and seen what community can do, and helped to (hopefully) create value for thousands of people that read these words daily or watch my videos.
That doesn’t negate the fact that the internet is also a great double edged sword: while you can learn anything, you can also be taken over by meaningless, infinite distraction, manipulated into seeing the world in certain ways, and lose your humanity if you are not careful. We took a wrong turn by locking ourselves into content silos and embracing comfort instead of seeking truth, and it will not end well unless we do a hard u-turn to authenticity and sovereignty. As we continue in this perpetual lockstep to making the internet a worse place, I will be, hopefully with a few of you, using the internet as if it were 1999.
How are you using the internet as if it were a more sane time in history? Post a comment or send me an email.
As always, God bless, and until next time.
If you enjoyed this post, consider Supporting my work, Checking out my book, Working with me, or sending me an Email to tell me what you think..