Indeed, this seems to be already planned. https://radicle.dev/faq "Radworks intends to offer services built on top of Radicle."
Still, time has passed and I have become more interested in GitHub alternatives (https://figbert.com/posts/ideating-tragit/). Will likely end up moving to Tangled. But first I need to add support over there for pushing over HTTPS...
If there's purely an agentic forge one day, it's likely going to be a distributed one, with cryptographic identities and signed artifacts by default.
1. Does Radicle also work over TOR? 2. Does Radicle support Git LFS and/or Git Annex?
Maybe I'm not the target audience for this, so pardon my ignorance when I ask what problem does this solve? Centralization and censorship?
There are rough edges and the seeding thing is a bit mehhh. And honestly there are a bunch of things I would do differently but I like the spirit of things.
Not sure where the authors of the project stand, but it's fun to see them make progress.
Some nitpicks:
* What is with the forced serif font on the website?
* Does this support other version control systems? Like mercurial, SVN, pijul, etc.?
[^1]: https://radicle.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/369876-RIPs/to...
[1] - https://radicle.dev/guides/user#4-embracing-the-onion [2] - https://radicle.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/369873-Support
No it doesn't currently support other VCS's but we have planned for that possibility in future!
All you would need is cargo compatibility, and a trusted namespace that kept up with the metadata of the current contents of crates.io, right?
edit: I really, really like rust, and love basically all of their choices about the language, but I can't stand the feeling that I'm being tricked into an ecosystem dependent on one of the worst behaved companies in the world, and I can't stand that a lot of rust projects smell like GPL-washing.
That being said, git is GPL and radicle is MIT, so it feels like the same thing, but Github also ain't git. I prefer MIT to MS; if radicle gets important enough and decides to rubpull, there will inevitably be a Free fork anyway.
> What is Radicle? How is it different from Git/GitHub?
> Radicle is a peer-to-peer code collaboration platform (βforgeβ) built on Git. Unlike centralized platforms like GitHub, there is no single entity controlling the network or user data. Repositories are replicated across peers in a decentralized manner. Radicle is an alternative for people and organizations who want full control of their data and user experience, without compromising on the social aspects of collaboration platforms.
(Quote from their FAQ).
This isn't even trying to answer the titular question... None of them, actually.
So, what is Radicle? A platform built on Git? What does this mean? A platform for what? What is it for?
Why Git/GitHub are used as if they were the same category of things? There's not even an attempt at answering the "how is this different from Git?" question. What does it offer that Git doesn't? Wtf is "forge"?
Radicle is an alternative... to what? I believe I have full control of my data in my Git repository... why do I need an alternative with even more control? How will I have even more control?
* * *
Maybe whatever this software does is actually useful or even good, but the documentation can't be worse.
Basically allow people to deploy something closer to gitea on a webserver initially, which has all the basic protocol features and sharing aspects implemented.
Currently the focus seems to have been very much on just the seeding & p2p part which honestly is good but not very useful for me as a developer/user who wants to work on a collaborative project.
Prioritizing P2P makes sense, but the UX/DX of radicle is not intuitive to put it mildly.
I went to the explorer radicle.network and my own as well and I still had no idea how to create an issue or submit a patch or login to an account or anything of that sort.
I opened the cli and figured out how to do all that, but then I created another node on my web server and now I have no idea how to connect to it, then I figured out how to do that, now how do I share my node without sharing it publicly, figured that out.
Cool now we are at the starting point, so every time I need to work on a project i will have to clone it, but why can't I create stuff in webui.
Maybe there is a setting I can't seem to find it yet.
But the jumping through hoops is mindbending. For a solution that could replace github for me and my friends who maintain a few public projects that wants small contributions from large number of folks as we try and maintain the local "tech" clubs.
Getting low information folks to use within 10 mins, is the bar that I have set for any platform I can use to replace github.
Radicle isn't that yet! anyways.
But I like the direction, putting contributors, access list, issues and prs in the repo is a brilliant idea, maybe put agent plans in it too, agent sessions as well maybe...
I would go as far as to say, something like a radicle network is better than every other alternative, but the UX is just not there yet.
* crates.io's attachment to GitHub is a fact about crates.io specifically, not the Cargo crate registry protocol
* Cargo's support for Git repositories is generic across Git and has nothing to do with GitHub specifically
* Radicle offers nothing to a crate registry that a Git remote doesn't
* and none of this has anything to do with the GPL.
It feels like you're just listing off things you like and don't like aesthetically. They have nothing to do with each other structurally.
If you're not familiar with the distinction between git and github it could be even more confusing.
As soon as I hear decentralized I have lots of questions about the underlying protocols. Their protocol page helps a little but also uses terms I'm not familiar with like "gossip protocol".
It would be nice for there to be a page that motivates the project a bit more, ie. explaining the technical problems they are attempting to solve before enumerating the components of the complex system they've built.
> Radicle is a peer-to-peer code collaboration platform (βforgeβ) built on Git.
-----
> Why Git/GitHub are used as if they were the same category of things?
They are not. Github is a centralized collaboration platform built on git, and radicle is a peer-to-peer collaboration platform built on git.
-----
> Wtf is "forge"?
A word some people started using for the class of Github/Bitbucket(RIP) or even Fossil-type things, as FOSS alternatives began to multiply.
-----
> Radicle is an alternative... to what?
To Github, or other "forges."
Crates.io has not moved away from Github-only authentication, and got into the habit of yelling at people who complained about it.
> crates.io's attachment to GitHub is a fact about crates.io specifically, not the Cargo crate registry protocol
Is this just trivia you wanted to share? I feel like I covered it in the second sentence of the comment you're replying to.
> Cargo's support for Git repositories is generic across Git and has nothing to do with GitHub specifically
I'm looking to compile Rust projects from the semi-standard commonly-used crates. I do not want a Github account.
> Radicle offers nothing to a crate registry that a Git remote doesn't
Radicle offers peer-to-peer hosting that does not require a Github account.
> none of this has anything to do with the GPL.
Radicle is a project being built in Rust that partially reimplements git. Git is GPL-licensed, Radicle is MIT-licensed.
> It feels like you're just listing off things you like and don't like aesthetically.
I am unconcerned about your feelings. What I was saying is that I would like a peer-to-peer hosted, namespaced code repository that mirrors (or replaces) crates.io, and I do not want a github account to be necessary to use it.
> They have nothing to do with each other structurally.
I have no idea what "they" is referring to in this sentence.
[^1]: https://radicle.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/369274-General...
Notice how each additional sentence makes the previous sentence worse, like a turducken of solutions looking for problems, or a nesting doll where every layer is a different kind of sadness. This, I presume, is what happens when you have a hammer and a screwdriver and a chainsaw, and you decide that every problem would be better solved by using all three simultaneously while riding a unicycle.
But seeing as it already does exist, it's pretty awesome.
Gitlab and Github have pages and pages going over the domain language used to configure the job triggers. Jobs can trigger other jobs either in response to completion or as a dependency etc etc.
I would say these radicle-ci designs as they are now are actually quite rudimentary. That's perfectly fine for an early project but at this point I think you have to say that they won't have a CI system ready for quite some time.
Then why do they bring Git into the picture? They are not comparing themselves to Git...
> Radicle is a peer-to-peer code collaboration platform (βforgeβ) built on Git.
This is a word salad that means nothing... more than 99% of moderns software is built on Git in one way or another. Anything that is designed to be used by more than a single user could be arguably called a "collaboration platform". This description completely fails to describe anything useful about the program they are trying to describe. For instance, Git is a peer-to-peer code collaboration platform built on Git. And the same can be said about a huge number of programs that share very little in terms of purpose or application.
When someone writes a definition, s.a. you'd find in encyclopedia, the rule is that it has to (a) link to the broader category of things (b) specify in what way the subject is (mostly) unique in the category (a). If you give only (a), then the reader walks away wondering how is subject different from anything else in (a). If you only give (b), then the reader needs to guess (a), and if they fail, they may misattribute or simply abandon efforts to understand the subject.
This attempt at "definition" is the textbook example of forgetting the (b). It's something that a 10-12 y.o. could come up with... this is not what an adult should strive for.
> They are not. Github is a centralized collaboration platform built on git, and radicle is a peer-to-peer collaboration platform built on git.
You didn't understand the question.
Fwiw, I think this is a matter of UI/UX. I think radicle provides the foundation for everything you describe -- it is just the pr/patch & issue tracking substrate, and the p2p layer for federation.
To make an analogy, I think what you are saying is "Look, BitTorrent is great and all, but I want to be able to search for music and movies. I want IMDB with a download button." That's fair, but the problem BitTorrent is solving is more fundamental, and you can build Napster or ThePirateBay on top.
Radicle, like BitTorrent, is solving the transport layer.
Feels like using a free Jenkins gets you everything you want. Doesn't need more than a container or Java either.
Edit:
Breaking down the βword saladβ:
> Radicle is a peer-to-peer code collaboration platform (βforgeβ) built on Git.
Peer-to-peer: it functions with individual nodes on the network spreading state for tracking it without relying on a single entity or centralised service.
Code collaboration platform (forge): you use it not just to store code but provides a way to keep track of βpatchesβ (their term for PRs) and issues, amongst other things, to enable multiple people to collaborate on a code base
Built on git: the technology runs on top of git insofar as not only is the VCS just git, but the issues, patches, etc are stored in git. So the project isnβt merely developed using git, but when running the tool yourself itβs still backing everything under git.
I hope the definitions shared in the sibling comment will help.
> Then why do they bring Git into the picture? They are not comparing themselves to Git...
I would find it very strange if Github didn't mention git. It would be equally strange if radicle didn't mention git. They both wrap git.
[1] - https://radicle.network/nodes/index.radicle.garden/rad%3Az3G... , [2] - https://ambient.liw.fi/
Radicle is a sovereign {code forge} built on Git.
Get started β Run a seed β Guides Download FAQ Community Updates
Radicle is an open source, peer-to-peer code collaboration stack built on Git. Unlike centralized code hosting platforms, there is no single entity controlling the network. Repositories are replicated across peers in a decentralized manner, and users are in full control of their data and workflow.
The Radicle heartwood repository. Repository ID rad:z3gqcJUoA1n9HaHKufZs5FCSGazv5.
πΎ Radicle 1.8.0 Β· edde15d9ea700a70de04558fafc0b55360e9f5d2 2026-03-26T16:39:22+01:00
To install Radicle, simply run the command below from your shell, or go to the download page.
curl -sSLf https://radicle.dev/install | sh
Alternatively, you can build from source.
For now, Radicle only works on Linux, macOS and BSD variants.
For a graphical collaborative experience check out the Radicle Desktop client, as well.
The Radicle protocol leverages cryptographic identities for code and social artifacts, utilizes Git for efficient data transfer between peers, and employs a custom gossip protocol for exchanging repository metadata.
All social artifacts are stored in Git, and signed using public-key cryptography. Radicle verifies the authenticity and authorship of all data for you.
Radicle enables users to run their own nodes, ensuring censorship-resistant code collaboration and fostering a resilient network without reliance on third-parties.
Radicle is local-first, providing always-available functionality even without internet access. Users own their data, making migration, backup, and access easy both online and offline.
Radicleβs Collaborative Objects (COBs) provide Radicleβs social primitive. This enables features such as issues, discussions and code review to be implemented as Git objects. Developers can extend Radicleβs capabilities to build any kind of collaboration flow they see fit.
The Radicle Stack comes with a CLI, web interface and TUI, that are backed by the Radicle Node and HTTP Daemon. Itβs modular, so any part can be swapped out and other clients can be developed.
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β Radicle CLI ββ Radicle Web β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β Radicle Repository β β ββββββββββ ββββββββββ βββββββββββ β β β code β β issues β β patches β β β ββββββββββ ββββββββββ βββββββββββ β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€ β Radicle Storage (Git) β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β Radicle Node ββ Radicle HTTPD β ββββββββββββββββββ€βββββββββββββββββββ€ β NoiseXK ββ HTTP + JSON β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
Radicle is free and open source software under the MIT and Apache 2.0 licenses. Get involved by contributing code.
Follow us on π Mastodon, π¦ Bluesky or π¦ Twitter to stay updated, join our community on π¬ Zulip, or
If you have feedback, join our Zulip or send us an email at feedback@radicle.dev. Emails sent to this address are automatically posted to our #feedback channel on Zulip.