I did have a bit of fun myself finetuning esm2 in domain specific bacteria (cause it gives better score) and comparing it to another model (self created) and self created beat it at 25% more accuracy. Then for the 3d structure was coded a 3d protein visualizer hypergraph with the upload file option and visualize instantly the result. 2 days job :)
also 3 paper coauthors walked thru it with us: https://youtu.be/4g1bURdKN0Q
all this is part of the new AI for Science effort we are spinning up at Latent Space - all guidance and support would be greatly appreciated as this is a much harder domain to cover than software
Modeling protein-protein binding is still a massively unsolved problem, mainly because we don't really have the data. Alphafold2 was great but didn't actually 'solve' protein-folding as all input data is from single 'state' X-ray crystallography of the proteins, not 'really' how these proteins behave in the wild. So it's still very, very had to predict what binds to what, which of course is a multi-billion-dollar industry.
I work in a pharma-field and I wish we could easily design molecular binders. We still spend millions every year finding targets that could 'smuggle' our drugs into cells.
Some other players in this field are Boltz Lab and Isomorphic Labs (the Alphafold Google spinoff led by Hasabi). None of them can predict anything complex or 'big', everything is peptide-level. OP's work is another step towards something better.
The most interesting part in the preprint is that they find no matches for their designed binders in the world-write protein database. An open question with protein-designers is whether they just regurgitate training material, which is far easier to test with English-language models.
Okay, now you have my attention.
What's the deal on the company behind it? “Biohub is a 501(c)(3) biomedical research organization...” Nonprofit. Nifty!
This all sounds great, but as we have recently seen with, say OpenAI, there is nonprofit and then there is nonprofit. Anyone know which Biohub is?
Huh, appears to be actually open source, that's a pleasant surprise. Usually these academic models have some weird license attached to them.
a scientific engine for prediction, design, and discovery that can map proteins across the tree of life, predict their structures, and design new protein binders that function in laboratory experiments.
So, my issue with this is just like in a lot of the other areas of bio we're not able to explore outside the semantics of what is "known." Even a simpler task of just doing proper assembly is plagued by this. De Novo assembly of an alien/novel organism mixed with samples from other alien organisms would be impossible with what we can do today. Even with things that we're familiar we struggle with metagenomic assembly.Is this related to the current peptide boom?
It's not that HN readers lack intellectual curiosity or have some character flaw or narrow worldview, it's just that few people are reading and commenting between the late hours of Saturday and early morning of Sunday. It's 6 am Sunday in California as I post this.
But I dare to guess that most HN’ers did high school bio and that’s it, so it’s harder to even give a small thoughtful comment on it, so they refrain.
Case in point, I wouldn’t have commented either. But I feel at home here and notice some behavioral patterns. And compared to other fellow devs, I generally am more tuned to tune in on behavioral patterns because of having studied psychology.
But that’s just my take.
Do you need to predict when AP-MS is so cheap?
Mapping interaction interfaces is challenging and is where there is attention. I don’t think we’re going to get complexes as a commercial focus outside of receptors with known quaternary structure. The first issue, as you allude to, is the absence of training data, which itself highlights the relative commercial unimportance of such an endeavor.
They might like to think they are, they might try to pretend they are, but when pushed they're simply not.
Look at all of the groupthink that is perpetuated nonstop while they also proclaim they're creating, investing in, etc. so many unique ideas. Yet year after year it's the same thing in a different color.
What they actually are is interested in money and prestige. So give it a little time and they'll learn enough about biology to try and get some validation from their peers with comments. If money actually pours into bio that is.
Yes, because the expensive part is making the thing.
The HN/YC crowd generally has software brain: https://www.theverge.com/podcast/917029/software-brain-ai-ba..., "when you see the whole world as a series of databases that can be controlled with the structured language of software code". Biology doesn't work like that most of the time, it's squishy and weird and unpredictable, and the models we have of biology (including genomics!) are faulty at best, misleading at worst. I've supervised PhD-students and it takes some time for people's brains to be comfortable with that squishiness, that random behaviour, that 'putting A into the system only rarely produces B and we don't really know why but we do it anyway' view of the world. Software engineers struggle, even abhor that kind of world, which is why you rarely see them being interested in it; and if they work in it, outcomes are sometimes amazing and Nobel Prize worthy, more often nonsense that silently disappears.
interesting. i came to tech from a molecular biology background and my impression was the opposite. biology is predictable most of the time, but sometimes random and squishy. the trick is that we’re trying to learn why things work predictably and what causes the variations, and that why/how unknown is what is most uncomfortable for people outside of the disciplines.
i’m not fully disagreeing with you because it sounds like you have experiences that inform your perspective. i find it interesting because my own experiences bring me in from the inverse perspective.
It seems to me a lot of the modern "tech-bro culture" is trying to control the future and reduce uncertainty: Stop death, merge with the robotic super intelligence, colonize Mars to escape Earth inevitable decay, etc.
I'm still waiting for the startups claiming to reduce entropy or solve the false vacuum decay
The reason I don't now? It's that people don't understand biology enough to understand the currently untapped potential and definitely not the advances that have happened. So they allocate money to yet another todo app, food delivery app, crypto wallet, or yet another finetune of a model to talk like a caveman.
REDWOOD CITY, Calif., May 27, 2026 – Biohub today announced the release of a world model of protein biology: a scientific engine for prediction, design, and discovery that can map proteins across the tree of life, predict their structures, and design new protein binders that function in laboratory experiments.
Proteins are the machinery of life. Nearly every function of the human body depends on them. They are among the most important targets in medicine, yet designing functional, stable proteins that work as intended in the body is an immense scientific and technical challenge.

ESMC provides a foundation for modeling the sequence, structure, and function of proteins. ESMFold2 predicts the structure of proteins and biomolecular complexes with state-of-the-art accuracy and speed. Features derived from model representations capture fundamental principles of structure and function, forming a compositional grammar for protein biology.
Today, Biohub is making available to researchers everywhere an open discovery engine for protein structure prediction, design, and biological discovery built around three releases: ESMC, ESMFold2, and ESM Atlas:
All three are freely available to the global scientific community at Biohub Platform.
“Designing the interactions between proteins is a fundamental problem in biochemistry, and critical for the design of medicines. What we’ve shown is that these models have learned such a high-fidelity world model of biology that you can design protein interfaces computationally, take them into the laboratory, and they function as predicted.”
— Alex Rives, Head of Science, Biohub
ESMFold2 is an open, state-of-the-art structure prediction model that translates knowledge of patterns across evolution encoded in ESMC into precise, atomic-resolution 3D models of proteins and their interactions. It leads across standard protein folding benchmarks at predicting protein-protein and antibody-antigen interactions.

ESMFold2 achieves state-of-the-art accuracy in structure prediction, both for general protein-protein interactions and for the challenging and therapeutically relevant task of antibody-antigen prediction. From ESMC representations alone, ESMFold2 is more successful at predicting the true binding pose of antibody-antigen complexes than AlphaFold 3. When provided with the same evolutionary information (MSA) as AlphaFold, ESMFold2 is the strongest predictor on both benchmarks. Bottom: structure prediction models can benefit from a larger computational budget. When we let models make multiple predictions and score them based on their own confidence estimates, ESMFold2 consistently improves with more compute.
Antibody-based therapies have become a cornerstone of modern medicine, accounting for roughly one quarter of all new FDA drug approvals, spanning cancers, autoimmune diseases, and conditions that once had few treatment options. Finding a viable therapeutic candidate depends on identifying molecules that bind tightly and specifically to a disease target; a single preclinical binder candidate typically takes three to four years to develop. ESMFold2, which predicts the structural configurations most likely to achieve high affinity for a given target, can move much of the initial search into computation, producing experimentally testable designs in days.
Biohub researchers used the model to design protein binders against five targets at the center of cancer and immunology research — EGFR and PDGFRβ (implicated in tumor growth), PD-L1 and CTLA-4 (immune checkpoints that cancer cells exploit to evade detection), and CD45 (a regulator of immune cell signaling). Designs achieved hit rates of 36–88% for compact minibinders and 15–29% for antibody-derived formats, with confirmed binding in laboratory experiments. For PD-L1, designed binders restored T cell signaling in laboratory tests, blocking the same pathway that approved checkpoint therapies target.
ESMFold2 changes the accuracy and speed of early therapeutic binder discovery, transforming the initial search from largely empirical screening into computation-guided design that takes hours or days.
“Biohub was built on the belief that open science accelerates discovery. Making these tools freely available means researchers everywhere can move faster toward personalized cures that work for individual patients, because they target the specific biology driving their disease.”
—Dr. Priscilla Chan, Biohub Co-Founder
The world model of protein biology is trained on the evolutionary record of life itself, billions of protein sequences spanning the full breadth of life, including bacteria in deep soil, organisms in extreme environments, and the more than 20,000 types of proteins found in the human body. Its training objective is simple: predict the amino acids that evolution selects. Because evolution tends to preserve proteins that are fit for purpose, the patterns preserved across billions of years of data implicitly encode the physical rules governing protein function. What this work shows is that from this training, a world model emerges — one that has internalized those rules deeply enough to generate functional proteins from scratch.
Biohub’s mission is to cure and prevent disease. We believe the path to that goal is understanding biology at its deepest level — and making the tools of that understanding available to every scientist. Together, ESMFold2, ESMC, and ESM Atlas constitute a state-of-the-art, openly available ecosystem for protein structure prediction and design — a shared foundation for any researcher working on fundamental biology or the development of new therapeutics.
###
About Biohub
Biohub is a 501(c)(3) biomedical research organization building the first large-scale initiative to combine frontier AI and frontier biology to solve disease. With its compute capacity, AI research and engineering, and state-of-the-art technology for measuring, imaging, and programming biology, Biohub is enabling scientists worldwide to use AI-powered biology to study how cells operate and organize as systems — ultimately understanding why disease happens and how to cure or prevent it. Learn more at biohub.org.
Press Contact
press@biohub.org