When renting a flat, simply head straight to the bathroom and flush the toilet. If the toilet flush is good, the flat is fine.
With the quasi supercomputers we have, that somehow apps that exist to edit and display text crap themselves on ordinary <1mb files is just weird. There should be no trade-offs.
[1] https://discuss.logseq.com/t/logseq-unusable-for-long-form-p...
Both were written at the same time, both deal with ocean adventures, and both (IMHO) are much longer than they need to be.
Then you can have multiple Jules tests, depending on occasion!
I haven’t read moby dick but i dropped 20’000 leagues under the see a bit past half the book because of this. At some point the author spent pages and pages and pages describing the environment under the see, often repeating himself.
I’ll get back to that book at some point but yes, it’s longer than it needs to be.
It’s been a long time since I read the book but it was doubtless one of the most enjoyable I’ve read.
Something that helps me is just giving myself license to skip stuff. It's usually better I finish a book since I will never come back to it. So I just jump around a few pages if I get bored.
12 Apr 2022
How many items should your todo list handle? Not the most pressing question in the world, but one that I sometimes wonder about.
I think productivity apps should scale to “user generated” content. I don’t expect every app to load multi-gigabyte log files, but it should handle what I can write myself.
I use “Moby Dick” to test that. I know it’s longer and uses bigger words than anything I’ll write. If the app works well with “Moby Dick” then that’s a good indication that it will handle my needs also.
Here’s the test:
Computers are really fast, Moby Dick is tiny compared to this fastness. If an app doesn’t pass this test that suggests to me that there might be problems. This is just a test–a good app for you might fail this test, a bad app for you might pass.
Test Files: