This could be both for small scale things (e.g. which part of this is squeaking?) or large scale (e.g. is that booming noise coming from the construction a few blocks away?)
How are they planning on distributing a shared, highly precise clock for that purpose? That's already a PITA if you do QO-100 modes that need high precision, but usually there it's enough to have one good clock that you feed to the LNA... but here? Every single one of these modules needs a very precisely identical timing signal and the kind of chips you can use to multiplex a reference clock signal are pretty expensive.
I work primarily in sub-GHz radio. Please wake me up when they launch their LoRa version, that would be an instant purchase for me.
They came out at $500
Being off by a bit is fine. Being off by 5x to 10x is.. Yikes.
I have heard claims of devices (mostly TVs) supposedly coming with secret 5G cell uplinks built in [never heard a specific model mentioned though].
If there were more variants covering more commonly-used RF bands, people could walk around and literally check for once.
(incidentally i'm sure three letter agencies have had this sort of tech in their bug-detecting toolkit for a LONG time)
https://www.fluke.com/en-us/product/industrial-imaging/fluke...
Since ~2022 and accelerated by the Russian aggression against Ukraine, governments are now behind both private and open source for frontier technology.
The companies that captured government contracts in the last century can’t move fast enough to bring tech into the government and national technology policy and funding is collapsing compared to the private sector
That’s new in history
This gizmo is primarily interesting that it's pre-packaged at a price that hobbyists can afford.
Drawing a splodge in roughly the location (not sure if there's range info either? I doubt it if it's passive) overlaid on the video likely won't cut it...
Open source doesn't mean the end of competition, since we are a competitive species.
I think the future economy is going to be some sort of UBI + large open source projects
One big issue with radar is that it has the same problem pilots and human observers do: it struggles to distinguish drones from anything else in the sky (birds, balloons, planes, etc.). This is an active and improving research space, but by and large with radar, when your pilots report a drone, you still don't know how to figure out if it's the typical mis-identification or something real.
From documentation, QuadRF: Operating frequency range of 4.9 - 6.0 GHz (C-Band).
RF drone detection has been a challenging problem for quite a while. Lots of solid state radar/RF detection products have emerged in the space, but it is not a trivial problem. And that is for drones with active RF comms, anything flying autonomously is even harder to detect at a far enough range to actually do something about.
And I've read about airport shutdowns in UK and US without a single arrest which is why it keeps happening
So whatever system exists, apparently not good enough
It would be great to have a wider range like other SDRs but of course the cost will increase exponentially.
Correct, there is no bullet proof cuas system to this date.
> anything flying autonomously is even harder to detect
Not just autonomously, because even in autonomous mode you would still need other RF like gnss, but you can fly drones without any rf signature at all and utilize a pre captured images saved on board to navigate the drone accurately using its cameras (normal or thermal). In this case, rf interference won’t work, it won’t be detected based on rf signature either, you will have to rely solely on visuals and acoustic, fly at night, and only left with acoustics.. it is a very hard task from technical standpoint.
Being able to do local soft-run testing on-site to be sure that you eliminate the easy 90% of issues before you get to the lab would be a huge win.
Point still stands that they initially said it would be $50-$100. And its going for $500.
This seems more like a tool for checking across entire large assemblies like an entire building, car, aircraft, etc, for unknown sources. If you have an individual discrete device that you're already testing, just using traditional instrumentation seems reasonable, but on a large, complex assembly, I can see it being useful. Also useful for things like detecting if a particular antenna is working without actually going up there to measure near it; if you have a MIMO setup with multiple antennas, this might make it easier to check if all of them are working correctly when mounted in inconvenient areas.
This seems more useful for finding unknown or hidden RF sources, for instance looking thorugh an entire building to find unknown RF sources, or maybe a whole complex assembly like a car or aircraft.
Odd, because export controls don't generally apply to published material (like open source software), but maybe they were worried that because they were also selling the hardware they could have issues due to the combo being export controlled.
I've seen so many random industrial devices and parts come into our plant that have their own cellular it's wild.

The QuadRF (pictured above) a phased-array radio built around a Raspberry Pi 5 and an FPGA board with picosecond-level timing. It does advanced signal processing and beamforming.
It can see WiFi through walls and track drones in flight.
If the open source community can come up with something like this, just imagine what governments are capable of.
When you plug a computer into a network, tools like Wireshark can show all the hidden traffic you might not even know is there. WiFi packets are the same, but those travel through the air, allowing snooping without physical access.
The QuadRF has built-in software that can stream and decode RF, and you can pipe it out to a more powerful computer for things like WiFi traffic analysis.
I mention this not to scare you—governments have had tools like these for years. It's just better to know what's possible and expose bad security practices than to ban useful tools like these. So if you're in the CIA, don't get any ideas.

After spotting QuadRF on Hackaday, I reached out to Martin McCormick, who's been working on QuadRF as part of a bigger project: a Moon-scale antenna array, capable of EME (Earth-Moon-Earth) radio experiments and radio astronomy.
I think Martin took inspiration from Dishy, SpaceX's original Starlink terminal. (Makes sense, since Martin worked at SpaceX on the team that built Dishy!)
Instead of locking this phased array antenna system into a proprietary satellite system, licensed operators will ideally be able to chain multiple QuadRF modules together for interesting radio experiments, with up to 1.15 MW EIRP—basically, a massive amount of directional antenna gain, for high power RF fun.
But QuadRF is scaled down to handheld-size, and while it isn't powerful enough to send a signal to the moon, it's still quite useful in local SDR applications and visualizing the RF environment—at least in its frequency range of 4.9-6 GHz.
But I specifically asked Martin if he'd be willing to send over a prototype QuadRF for my Dad (a retired broadcast radio engineer) and I to test.
I had already placed a pre-order on Crowd Supply (where a basic kit is $499), but I wanted to see if QuadRF was really as useful or intuitive as it seemed from the videos ScaleRF posted.
Spoilers: it's still a little rough in the UI department, but I was blown away by how well it works. Especially considering everything's running on a Raspberry Pi 5.
When you turn it on, the Pi boots up and creates a WiFi hotspot. You connect to that, and visit http://quadrf/. That page runs a VNC session in your browser, where you can launch apps from GNU Radio to SDR software, and even their custom AR (Augmented Reality) RF visualizer.
The AR visualizer is the most interesting included software, despite being less useful for real-world SDR applications.

The UI is a little rough, but you can adjust the alignment between your camera and the phased array, and the gain of the receiver.
Then it will visualize frequencies from 4.9-6 GHz as colorful 'blobs'. The scale is not shown on the display in this early version, but from my testing around the studio, my 5 GHz WiFi network (which was running on Channel 100, or around 5.5 GHz) showed up light blue. Neighboring WiFi networks were showing up red or green.
If you order the Mobile Expansion Pack, it incorporates a battery power pack, and a handheld phone mount, so you can walk around analyzing part of the C-band in real-time.

My Dad and I flew his DJI Mini Pro 4 behind the studio, and the QuadRF had no trouble picking it out of the sky. As it flew away, I had to increase the gain to keep seeing it; it would be nice to have AGC or an easier gain control as the UI was a little clunky when carrying around the contraption.
It sounds like the crowdfunding campaign is already beyond expectations, and they'll be switching the enclosure to an injection mold (the version I have is 3D printed).

One aspect that intrigued me was the use of the Raspberry Pi's MIPI lanes for low latency SDR streaming I/Q (In-phase/Quadrature) at data rates over 5 Gbps. From the QuadRF Documentation:
The novel approach of streaming I/Q over the Pi’s camera and display FFC MIPI connectors has many benefits. MIPI can handle >5 Gbps, low-latency, full-duplex data transfer through the Pi’s RP1 chip. It is simpler and more reliable than USB, adds almost zero hardware cost to the RF board, and can sustain hundreds of MSPS of I/Q with no hiccups or sample loss. Considering cameras and displays are the ultimate form of high-bandwidth signal streaming, it makes sense their standard digital interface is a great match for SDR! We think the industry should adopt it more widely!
It sounds like they had to reverse-engineer the MIPI protocol used on the Pi 5 to do this (since it goes through the RP1 chip), and the way it's architected, you can daisy-chain multiple QuadRF modules together, letting each module calculate its own phase shift.
I'm not sure how that will work in practice, but it sounds pretty neat. PCIe could probably work in a pinch, too, but this implementation frees up the PCIe connector in case you want high speed storage or even higher speed networking than the Pi offers.
As with all pre-production gear I test, take everything I've shown with a grain of salt. And with any crowdfunding campaign, if you back it, don't expect the QuadRF to show up on your doorstep overnight.
I was initially skeptical about how useful and fun this little handheld phased array could be, but after using it for a week, I can't wait until the one I pre-ordered ships!