However privacy is central in a service like this and I think you should probably beef up your representation of how you deal with that.
eg. "We use each customer’s data only for that customer" - well that customer may have hundreds of staff; how are they being consulted and onboarded wrt their own voices (or is that transcripts?) and messages being used in this way?
ofc you might argue that nothing in work is private but I do think you have some margin for improving the detail here.
How far can I get with just keywords, common phrases, boring traditional analysis?
Depending on what I measure there, when is the right time for me to consider upgrading to something like Agnost/what is a specific example of what it will find that traditional/rigid analytics approaches will miss?
Lovely name! I implemented profanity monitoring in my Hermes setup to identify "learning opportunities" for my agents. It is quite useful. If you are budget-conscious, one challenge is determining what is the smallest number of previous rounds that Hermes needs to correctly infer what it did wrong. Curiously, Claude Code is horrible at figuring out what it did wrong. I often read its memories, and they are rarely useful.
I don't get the appeal of the UI, why is it so complex/convoluted.
for profanity, did you define keywords or just let the agent figure out rage stuff?
how many rounds did you set for the hermes? claude doesnt work yea on its own, one of my friends set us up for their claude lol
interestingly, even embeddings seem to bucket "no" and "nooo!" somewhat similar, but are pretty different when viewed from a user satisfaction perspective.
A sweet spot on moving to Agnost is the time when you get higher inflow of conversations you can't manually read or listen, and want to clusterize them into things which matter, with the outliers highlighted
although we had a few customers who come to us after running this for a while so at smaller volume it does work well.
Looking forward to your "show HN" post.
Backed by Y Combinator










why agnost
Agnost finds the missed failures in real conversations and turns them into fixes your team can review.

“In collaboration with Agnost AI, we have integrated comprehensive observability features into MCP Toolbox for Databases.”

“Agnost AI is very useful in tracking analytics and error rates.”
Ishan GoswamiMember of Technical Staff, Exa
“Our Voice BDRs got meaningfully better at booking meetings once Agnost AI surfaced the patterns behind the conversations that actually converted.”
Ana Paula OlaizFounding GTM, Corgi Insure
1,247feature requests surfaced from user chats
“Agnost AI showed me users were asking for features we don't even have. I had no idea. All that feedback was just sitting inside conversations we already had.”
“Agnost AI is how we make our agents better. We see what to improve, ship it, and move faster. Simple as that.”

16/18autonomous PRs merged
“Agnost AI spotted bugs buried in our agent's conversations and opened PRs to fix them overnight.”
Aamish Ahmad BegCo-Founder & CEO, Lopus AI
PRICING
The earlier you start ingesting conversations, the smarter your agent gets, so connect today.
STARTER
Free
Best for teams shipping agents that need to get better fast.
PRO
$499/mo
Best for growing teams scaling agent volume without a sales call.
ENTERPRISE
Custom
Best for organizations running agents at scale.

frequently Asked Questions