What's the deal with all the random weekly quota resets for agents lately?

This article reads like a description of gambling-addiction behavior; the author appears to be addicted to using LLMs.

He's eagerly awaiting his next hit of dopamine from his favorite model. He's setting timers to be ready for when his next hit comes available. He's spinning up unnecessary queries just to start the timer ticking on new models.

You could basically write the same article about some guy who sits in a casino all day eagerly awaiting double-your-winnings bonuses or similar.

They're giving everyone their next hit.

What I read on social media about people and these resets gives off literal worst kind of addiction vibes. I've literally seen people talking about "Oh I had an existential crisis without Fable/GPT-5.6"

These people legitimately need help, or alternatively a social life.

Maybe its different on my end because I just use a sub outside of work for fun stuff. At work its not my money so I don't really care. I go to work, maybe use these subs at home every once in a while for a fun personal project and if I hit the limits (I rarely even do) I play video games or hang out with my wife/family.

People are borderline tying their identities to these models it seems, and yet most people aren't even building anything interesting.

My guess is they are getting folks used to the idea of:

1. The end of unlimited token subsidization and a new status quo of metered usage limits.

2. Adding to the above, self-initiated usage limit resets give you some control and again help lessen the sting of the end of subsidization.

Right now though, I think Anthropic and OpenAI are in open MAU war ahead of their respective IPOs and that might be a bigger factor.

If I had to guess uncharitably, I’d say they want you to feel like you keep getting something extra for “free” while you’re getting the same service you should have expected as normal 3 months ago.

That explains it! I was wondering about this just today as I saw it hd reset. Alas I don't need to wait another 7 days..

It feels like Anthropic was affected by resource limitations upon launch or big adoption curves in the past, and now they're tyring to be mindful of having less of those, in several ways, one of which is trying to keep capacity to keep core services running and let the high demand not impact the rest of the system.

WHen it doesn't turn out that way, it opens up options.

At the same time if other model providers were anticipating Anthropic or someone else to have problems at launch, and were waiting in the wings with their own models to launch competitively, it sets off a capacity release competition.

One might lower prices, one might give it away, or just make it available, and then there are users on other platforms with limits, or free until a certain day, etc.

Competition. If Anthropic had followed through on their plan to put Fable under API pricing, users would have jumped ship en masse to GPT 5.6 (or perhaps to K3 if it turns out to be good enough.)

They're giving everyone their next hit.

These people legitimately need help, or alternatively a social life.

People are borderline tying their identities to these models it seems, and yet most people aren't even building anything interesting.

My guess is they are getting folks used to the idea of:

1. The end of unlimited token subsidization and a new status quo of metered usage limits.

2. Adding to the above, self-initiated usage limit resets give you some control and again help lessen the sting of the end of subsidization.

Right now though, I think Anthropic and OpenAI are in open MAU war ahead of their respective IPOs and that might be a bigger factor.

That explains it! I was wondering about this just today as I saw it hd reset. Alas I don't need to wait another 7 days..

WHen it doesn't turn out that way, it opens up options.

One might lower prices, one might give it away, or just make it available, and then there are users on other platforms with limits, or free until a certain day, etc.

This article reads like a description of gambling-addiction behavior; the author appears to be addicted to using LLMs.

You could basically write the same article about some guy who sits in a casino all day eagerly awaiting double-your-winnings bonuses or similar.

Gambling addition implies dopamine hits from irregular and uncertain outcomes: as I note in the post, I don't get a dopamine hit from running agents. I know people say "LLMs are just gambling because they're next-token-maximizers that can't write real code" but with GPT 5.6 Sol (and a few new tricks I discovered) the outputs are much less irregular and uncertain. It's just typical engineering.

> This article reads like a description of gambling-addiction behavior; the author appears to be addicted to using LLMs.

you're projecting, it's just insanely irritating to work with a tool that 1) limits its' own use 2) with a random interval.

keeping in mind that plenty of people are making money on token use..

this guy sets a timer to wake up for work; he appears to be addicted to work.

Competition. If Anthropic had followed through on their plan to put Fable under API pricing, users would have jumped ship en masse to GPT 5.6 (or perhaps to K3 if it turns out to be good enough.)

Theoretically it'll still happen tomorrow. But we'll see--I think they've extended it twice?

> This article reads like a description of gambling-addiction behavior; the author appears to be addicted to using LLMs.

you're projecting, it's just insanely irritating to work with a tool that 1) limits its' own use 2) with a random interval.

keeping in mind that plenty of people are making money on token use..

this guy sets a timer to wake up for work; he appears to be addicted to work.

Theoretically it'll still happen tomorrow. But we'll see--I think they've extended it twice?

The image that makes me say

The image that makes me say “yay” less often than “god damn it”.

Subscription-based coding agents such as Claude Code and Codex famously have 5-hour and weekly quotas on their LLM usage. Both of these are understandable: 5-hour quotas help stagger usage so the servers don’t get overloaded, and weekly resets prevent users from dumping an entire month’s worth of usage into a single day which a) also prevents overload and b) stops the user from just unsubscribing after they do so. Both Anthropic and OpenAI have played around with quota limits, from doubling them for a limited time to even removing the 5-hour quota.

These model providers can reset the weekly quota for all users, often gifted as compensation in the event of technical glitches on their end. If, for example, you have a $100/mo Codex plan, then a weekly reset is worth $25 to you assuming you fully consume your quota—nowadays with the cost of top-tier LLMs like Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol, that’s easier to do. However, these quota resets are not telegraphed and are generally not announced through company-owned channels: unless you follow specific people such as Thibault Sottiaux (Tibo), the engineering lead for Codex, you just look at your weekly quota and see it’s at 100%. You can even get a quota reset hours before your actual reset and not benefit from it all.

Recently, in the wake of the release of Fable 5/GPT-5.6, Anthropic and OpenAI have been doing weekly quota resets for their harnesses far more frequently. In the past two weeks, OpenAI has directly reset the Codex weekly quota six times: July 9, July 10, July 10 (again), July 14, July 15, and July 17. That’s not even getting into the rarely discussed banked reset system for Codex, where OpenAI gave quota resets July 12 and July 13 which can be manually used at any time but expire within 30 days.

https://codex-resets.com tracks Codex resets.

No one wants to be the weirdo who complains about literally getting free stuff because if the quota resets stop, they will be the one blamed for it. Despite that, I’m going to be the weirdo who complains about literally getting free stuff.

As a person who doesn’t like wasting money if I can easily avoid it, I try to use as much of my weekly quota as I can. I was on the $20/mo Codex plan but with the promise of GPT-5.6 on the horizon and with the frequency I kept hitting the 5-hour limits, I upgraded to the $100/mo plan. By using GPT-5.5, I used the 5x prompt capacity to build and test a number of ambitious projects, but that’s a topic for another blog post. I was able to consistently exhaust my weekly quota over the full week, although I had to have a browser window open with my Codex usage to constantly monitor it. I’ve set reminders on my phone for the exact time a 5-hour or weekly quota resets so I can keep running more prompts—as an aside, I wish there was a canonical platform endpoint to programmatically check Codex usage amount and the quota reset times so I could just vibecode an app to manage for me. Before the release of GPT-5.6, I thought “should I deliberately exhaust my quota all on the weaker GPT-5.5 and gamble that OpenAI does a quota reset to greet GPT-5.6?” (I did not exhaust my quota and OpenAI did indeed do a quota reset)

GPT-5.6 Sol is indeed a great model that does live up to the hype, and I’ve had to create new projects just to have an excuse to test its limits. The rate of quota usage is about the same as GPT-5.5 even with a prompt running at all times. Despite that, almost every time a reset has happened after the GPT-5.6 release, it has been when my weekly quota has been at 50+%, which makes me feel like I “wasted” $12. There’s also the factor that when the quota resets occur, the weekly reset time is unset, so I have to input some prompt just to trigger it again even if I’m doing something else.

@emollick / X

After the flurry of quota resets over the past two weeks, the intended excitement has instead become annoyance as I now have to urgently create new ideas to spin down the quota before it inevitably resets again. Random rewards are supposed to give a dopamine hit but I end up with a net dopamine deficit from both the sense of wasted quota and having to abruptly change my plans. I admit that this may just be a sign I’m burnt out and need to take a break.

Tibo polls if there are too many resets, with a few thousand responses.

Resets of the weekly quota for all users must be ludicrously expensive for these companies, although when you already spend billions of dollars in CapEx per year it’s likely a rounding error. The recent surge of quota resets is likely not a coincidence: July has been an insane month in LLM releases, with not just Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol pushing frontier models even further, but also Grok 4.5, Muse Spark 1.1, and Kimi K3 offering more options across the cost/utility curve. The cynical take is that weekly quota resets are not intended to be fun serendipity, but instead intended to prevent power users from experimenting with sufficiently competitive competitors once the quota naturally runs out.

I don’t expect weekly quota resets to last forever even if competition intensifies, because if quotas keep resetting this frequently they won’t matter at all. It would instead give me an incentive to downgrade from the $100/mo plan back to the $20/mo plan to avoid wasting quota, which I don’t think is OpenAI’s intended goal.

Hacker Times

Hacker Times

What's the deal with all the random weekly quota resets for agents lately?

Discussion

Discussion