Jumping straight into the middle of the article you might believe you stumbled onto The Onion.
But one thing that’s interesting with the administration’s approach to so many things is the removal of tools to get information. In the article (which works in brave which suppresses the pop up) they talk about this tool to collect information on how a crash occurred. I get wanting to change priorities. As a bicyclist I can understand if road space is optimized for other uses due to the predominant form of use.
But I think one of the reasons the US is so prosperous is that we have here a reliable and high-quality data collection machine. The less you know about yourselves the worse you can achieve your objectives.
Massive tragedy that data collection fell to ideology. Though the ideology is very funny. It sounds like an angry redditor!
“This is a common sense approach despite the Left's belief that everyone should ride a bike to their shoebox-sized apartment to eat crickets to achieve a phony climate agenda”
Using the universal analytical tool cui bono (more powerful than an LLM) and their own explicit words, there's a consistent, non-crazy strategy: Support the fossil fuel industry in every way possible (which appeals to some people; I'm not writing a critique; you should understand this.):
* Destroy or acquire national competitors: Venezuala, Iran,
even Nigeria
* Buy off domestic competitors: using tax dollars to bribe
renewable energy developments to stop
* A million other policy and political actions, major and
and minor; even opposing bike lanes.
Regarding 'crazy', it's a form of aggression - demonstrating there is no length to which they won't go, to intimidate the other side into backing down. It's been the American neo-right rhetorical tactic going back decades - be aggressive, and if that doesn't work, be more aggressive. Because nobody else has figured out this very basic tactic (used by even by animals), people keep backing down and the tactic keeps working. You see people every day saying they are hopeless, tired, resigned, etc. Why would the neo-right stop - this is working amazingly well!(If you doubt it, see if my hypothesis predicts future events.)
Unfortunately there's a healthy subset of the Democratic party which is also against road infrastructure improvements like bike lanes and traffic calming. Car brain is an affliction which does not discriminate.
He's just trying to get under everyone's skin and it's working.
Look at those crowds of bikers... ICE protesters... no king protesters...
He's a showman and he loves it.
Stop giving him airtime.
So what if federal funding doesn't recognize bike lanes or whatever this is about?
Vote in competent city Councillors that will get bike lanes prioritized in your city if that's what you care about.
The government we deserve.
Nobody bother thinking coherent thoughts, insults and spurious non sequiturs are policy now.
And both Trump and Xi-Jiping are delivering just that, thanks God.
> One of the safety tools that has been taken down is known as the Pedestrian and Bicycle Crash Analysis Tool, or PBCAT. As of Thursday, a link to the page that formerly hosted the tool on the FHWA website was dead.
Was it actually being used? Is there an alternative/better data source? Is it the only one?
https://catsip.berkeley.edu/resources/crash-data/crash-data-...
Lists 7 federal reporting methods. Why aren't these sufficient? Why was this one special? Why are there so many!?
Who knows what the actual story is behind this, but it won't be found here!
I'm not sure what changed at NPR, but there seems to be a heavy lean towards emotion now rather than depth. In the past, when I've looking into these sort of framings, they often give a completely different perspective that could have been reported.
So I guess it's a common sense solution if you don't understand the first thing about roadway design?
Well the rate were this world is going with Climate Change, in 50 to 100 years the only method of transportation will be walking. That is after what could be called "the migration wars".
Getting out of fossil fuels should have started 30+ years ago. But people would rather have their children, grandchildren suffer far more then we would have if we took Climate Change seriously.
I, for one, cycle and still oppose bike lanes - they don't make cycling much safer (a car can easily jump a curb and most of these don't even have a curb, just some paint and plastic bollards in the best case) but impede traffic for everyone. If you want to increase cycling adoption you will piss off much fewer people and be 1000% more efficient by reigning in bike theft instead of building these lanes.
Just because there is not unanimous support for good policies, doesn’t mean they can’t be implemented.
Also a big win for local policy making, which used to be a preference of the right.
It's often an act of power, like a mob. It's the corruption of power made viceral.
> I've given up hope on transportation in the USA. It certainly won't be fixed within my lifetime.
Exactly the response your enemies planned. Act aggressive enough and the other side will give in. You're their best friend when you do it and every time you post it.
The funniest thing is that tactical use of bike lanes, neighborhood greenways, etc, actually serves to funnel cyclists into specific protected routes such that the majority of other roads have fewer cyclists utilizing them. From my home in Seattle, I can ride several miles to work on roads that were already low traffic volume, but which are faster because cyclists get priority, and cars get diverted away. Before this existed, I just used the main roads that cars did, because it was faster.
Like, if you hate bicycles, you should love bicycle infrastructure. It's better for everyone.
For example, a few years ago they replaced the bridge over a river just outside of town, adding a bike/pedestrian bridge on the side. This connects a county campground to town without requiring riding on the narrow bridge shoulder. Angry people oppose it because they think it's a waste.
Milwaukee WI has had several (awarded!) street reconstruction grants killed by this admin because they included bike lanes. They weren't bike lane _projects_, they are to primarily to rebuild crumbling unsafe streets, but they included bike lanes so the Fed's rescinded the grants and now most of the projects are dead. There's no local money to do it without the grants.
The real fix for this is to fix the stupid system we have, but for now it's what we're stuck with and this has a real impact you can't overcome locally.
New York has a complete streets program where bike lanes and pedestrian friendly crossings are included in most projects. Iirc 4-5 people have died crossing this road.
The call to action was that “those people” would use the bike lanes to leave the city, connect to the Democrat bike trail and rape, murder and rob the townsfolk.
Old fearful white people are terrified of this stuff.
Question: if the news reports something you don't like, is it fake?
Only one of them is totally nuts
That statement was provided by a DOT spokesperson as the explanation for the changes. As a real news organization, NPR was right to repeat the statements provided by the DOT so that their listeners (and readers) can know what the administration's views are. To do otherwise would be to hide facts from their listeners.
Many drivers either believe there are no cyclists; or that the number of cyclists should be reduced to zero, and they should drive instead, like normal people.
Also, everything is zero-sum, so any money spent on bike infrastructure is less money spent to widen the freeways or subsidize parking.
This is the official GOP policy, the best of what the GOP has to offer. Fight friends, betray allies, threaten your neighbors, drop bombs, smash bike lanes.
The driver, identified as 31-year-old Charles Medina, then sped past the couple from behind. Rapp’s boyfriend responded to the maneuver by raising his hands and yelling, at which point Medina slammed his brakes, skidded to a stop and accelerated in reverse. Medina ultimately hit Rapp so forcefully that his “rear windshield was shattered completely”. He also allegedly left skidmarks from having “rapidly accelerated backwards” as well as apparently “steering towards something while backing up”. Emergency responders found Rapp unresponsive and lying face down in the roadway. She was pronounced dead after being taken to a hospital.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/22/boxer-hannah...
One of Trump’s many talents is corrupting language. The phrase “fake news” was originally used to criticize his many outright lies about what was going on in the world during his first run for office, but he managed to change the meaning to “anything that doesn’t show him in the best possible light”.
He’s remarkably adept at demagoguery.
I would reframe most things more in terms of "what will I gain" to see how voters to vote, and new opportunities or bridges to bike to the hood gains them basically nothing.
As long as the government is captured by Capital, however, it's hard to make the case for them to "vote harder".
I couldn't find out if he ever got convicted or sentenced to anything.
But any cyclist, including myself, can tell you that there are people out there with murder in their hearts who want you to die just for the crime of delaying them by a few seconds.
In this case most of the hubbub was really about a pedestrian island that would block left turns to a business the guy was friends with. The woke people were out to get them for some reason, etc.
The racist dog whistle was very deliberate and targeted at Nextdoor. The messaging in more mainstream outlets was about lane width reductions causing a traffic nightmare. It was almost taken from Blazing Saddles.
In the self labeling as “Christian”, sense not so much.
There's an election every year (including special and midterms). The fight is annual and it's completely unfair to believe it's a quadrennial event and lead others to believe the same. Participate in your local elections. It's where all of this starts. The national is mostly noise that bubbles up and out.

Cycling activists protest against the federal government's plan to remove bike lanes near the National Mall in Washington, D.C., in March 2026. Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images hide caption
toggle caption
Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images
WASHINGTON — In the two weeks since Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy vowed to end support for "DEI bike lanes," a growing list of bike-related safety materials have disappeared from the Federal Highway Administration's website.
Even agency staff have been left guessing about why, said a person who works in web support for agencies at the Department of Transportation. They requested anonymity because they fear retribution for speaking publicly.
The person said FHWA staff have been asked to find, and in some cases take down, any references to bikes and bike lanes.
"Why do you need to take down bicycle safety, of all things?" they told NPR.
"We're not making the sites better, faster or quicker, you know, able to provide real information to the communities that use these resources," they said. "It's asinine."
Federal transportation officials have pulled down or edited dozens of pages of safety resources in the past week, according to an analysis by the Internet Archive Wayback Machine and internal FHWA emails obtained by NPR.
While there has been no official explanation, the changes appear to be part of a broader push to find and remove road safety materials from the FHWA website.
Earlier this month, the FHWA quietly removed a set of recommendations — including bike lanes and speed cameras — from a list of "Proven Safety Countermeasures" that have been vetted by agency staff and shown to improve road safety.
A DOT spokesperson told NPR in an emailed statement on Wednesday that the department "continuously reviews its policies to ensure each promotes safety, efficiency, and common sense."
"Since nearly 80% of the population uses cars to get to work and their important medical appointments, we are taking a closer look at federal guidance to ensure American families have the infrastructure they need," the spokesperson said. "This is a common sense approach despite the Left's belief that everyone should ride a bike to their shoebox-sized apartment to eat crickets to achieve a phony climate agenda."
But safety advocates warn that the Trump administration is undermining proven measures for reducing roadway crashes and fatalities, including some that date back decades.
One of the safety tools that has been taken down is known as the Pedestrian and Bicycle Crash Analysis Tool, or PBCAT. As of Thursday, a link to the page that formerly hosted the tool on the FHWA website was dead.
The tool is designed to capture detailed information about crashes involving cars, bicycles and pedestrians, including what combinations of vehicle maneuvers and roadway conditions led to the crash, which can help planners and safety advocates develop countermeasures to prevent similar crashes.
"That's really important because it helps us do a better job of tracking pedestrian and bicyclist fatalities across the nation," said David Harkey, who was the lead researcher on the project that initially developed the tool at the University of North Carolina's Highway Safety Research Center.
Today, Harkey is the president of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), a nonprofit organization funded by the auto insurance industry that works to reduce motor vehicle crash fatalities and injuries.
Harkey told NPR he's disappointed by the decision to remove the tool from the FHWA's website.
"This is an agency that claims that safety is a priority for them," he said. "It's important that proven tools and resources like PBCAT are there on their site and are available for safety professionals across the country."
Local and state officials may still be able to make use of PBCAT even if it's not publicly available on the FHWA website, Harkey said, because it's already embedded in the way they track crashes. Still, he would prefer the tool to be widely available from FHWA.
Based on his organization's conversations with FHWA staff, Harkey says the web tool remains "under review," though he said the details are murky.
"It's not clear to us what is being reviewed, what the criteria are, what they are looking for," Harkey said. "Hopefully this review will get completed sooner rather than later."
But Harkey isn't optimistic. He says the FHWA pulled down another critical safety tool — a database known as the Highway Safety Information System — 18 months ago. It still hasn't been restored.
"That's one of the frightening things about this process," Harkey said. "We've heard the same story that things are under review, and that once that review is completed, they hope to be able to put it back up. But we haven't seen that."

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy speaks during a Freedom 250 Grand Prix showcase in Washington earlier this month. Andrew Harnik/Getty Images hide caption
toggle caption
Andrew Harnik/Getty Images
Neither the FHWA nor the Transportation Department responded to questions about the criteria for the review, or how long it would take.
But an FHWA internal email seen by NPR provides a clearer picture of when the removal of bike- and safety-related materials from the FWHA website began.
Earlier this month, DOT announced more than $1.7 billion in discretionary grants that did not include funding for bike lanes or pedestrian projects. The Biden administration, by contrast, had used the same program to fund hundreds of millions of dollars in bike lanes and trails nationwide, along with other road and infrastructure projects.
"We're proud to support these great projects that will improve infrastructure, strengthen supply chains, make us safer, advance equity, and combat climate change," said then-Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg when he announced the grants in 2021.
Secretary Duffy said in a July 7 post on X that the Biden administration "used YOUR MONEY for DEI bike lanes and climate change. THAT'S OVER."
In response, critics noted that FHWA had previously acknowledged that bicycle lanes can make roads safer for all users.
But on July 9, a staffer in the FHWA's safety office sent an email with the subject line, "URGENT ACTION: Update Website," directing staff to remove that language from the website.
Specifically, the email directed staff to make significant changes to the list of "Proven Safety Countermeasures," as they're known, that have been shown to reduce crashes and save lives. "We received an urgent request from leadership to update web content in alignment with administration direction," the sender wrote, requesting that references to bike lanes, speed cameras and several other strategies related to speed be stripped from the list.
Safety advocates say it's normal for funding priorities to shift from one administration to another. But many say they're troubled by the push to remove evidence-based safety measures from DOT websites.
The person who works in web support for DOT agencies shares that concern.
"OK, got it. No more grants," they said. "But why does that mean I need to take down content? Like, Pedestrian Bicycle Crash Analysis Tool — who did it ever hurt, you know?"
More than 36,000 people were killed on U.S. roads last year. That number has been trending down since 2021, and the crash fatality rate in the U.S. is near an all-time low. Still, crash and fatality rates here remain far higher than in other developed countries.
The 2025 total includes more than 6,700 pedestrians and bicyclists who were killed.
"Safety involves everyone on the roadway," said Harkey, the IIHS president. "So if you really, truly believe as an agency that your job is to make sure safety is a priority, then you cannot remove tools and resources that are there to help you address those 20% of the fatalities on our roadways."