Also you can draw your own drums! What! That's so cool
If you find it interesting, a star on the GitHub repo helps a lot.
And don't forget to follow me on github, I build cool stuff!
You can prove that changing the material has no effect on the relative frequencies: \lambda_2 / \lambda_1, \lambda_3 / \lambda_1, etc. are completely independent of the material.
The shape is the determining factor; changing the materials (and hence the wave speed) just dilates the whole spectrum.
Ring out controls how fast the higher modes decay (basically stiff vs soft material), The mallet width controls how many modes a strike can even reach, since a real mallet can't drive the high frequency ones very hard.
No labeled presets like "wood" or "metal" though, just raw sliders. Would be a fun addition if someone wants to map a few physically sensible combos to buttons. PRs Welcome!
It does for me. But I do use an ad blocker (Wipr 2).
It would be interesting if you could simulate and then print (or laser cut) your own instrument on demand.
There are very few exceptions. Kac's drum paper is one. It's so nicely written!
A drumhead clamped at its rim can only vibrate in certain shapes, at certain frequencies. Those shapes and frequencies are the solutions of
−∇²u = λu inside the shape, u = 0 on the edge
Each solution u is a mode, a standing wave, and each λ gives a frequency proportional to √λ. This is an eigenvalue problem, and for almost every shape it has no formula. So Eigendrum solves it numerically: it covers your shape with a mesh of triangles, builds the finite element stiffness and mass matrices, and finds the smallest eigenvalues of Kφ = λMφ.
A few shapes have spectra that can be written down exactly, and the solver is tested against them on every change. A circle's frequencies are the zeros of Bessel functions; a rectangle's are π²(m²/a² + n²/b²). The solver reproduces both to better than a tenth of a percent, and because a conforming finite element method minimises energy over a restricted space, its answers are guaranteed slight _over_estimates, never under. The measured error is in “the numbers”.
Striking a spot drives each mode in proportion to how much that mode moves there. Hit a line where a mode stands still and you cannot excite it at all. That was not programmed in; it falls out of projecting the mallet onto the modes.
So a strike is never one mode: it is every mode at once, in a mixture set by where your mallet landed. The rules along the mode list are that mixture, and the modes marked with a square were the ones your mallet could not reach. Pressing a row instead plays that single mode alone - something no mallet can do, and the only way to hear what one frequency of a shape actually sounds like.
Besides tracing an outline you can write one. r(t) gives the radius as t sweeps one full turn, so 1 + 0.3cos(5t) is a five-lobed flower; a parametric x(t), y(t) pair reaches the closed curves polar cannot, like a nephroid or an egg. This is not a shortcut for drawing. It reaches shapes no hand traces accurately - eleven even lobes, a superellipse partway between a circle and a square - and it makes a shape something you vary: change one number and hear what moved.
A written shape travels as its own text. The link for a formula holds the formula, so it is something you can read and retype rather than a few hundred characters of encoded outline, and editing it in the address bar works. Anything too thin to mesh honestly is refused rather than answered, because a sliver would still return numbers and they would be wrong.
Mark Kac asked exactly that in 1966. In 1992 Carolyn Gordon, David Webb and Scott Wolpert answered no, by building two different shapes with identical spectra. Both are in the form list as Kac drum I and II. Each is made from the same seven triangles, rearranged. They enclose the same area and the same perimeter, and every frequency matches. Switch between them and listen: the outlines are plainly different and the sound is not.
The frequency ratios, the mode shapes and the pitch of the fundamental are physics, fixed entirely by the outline. What is not in the outline is the wave speed, which is tension and density: the pitch slider sets that by naming the note a circle of this area would sound, and each shape then lands above the reference by its own amount. Every shape is scaled to the same area before solving, so that offset is shape and not size - about six semitones across the built-in shapes, with the circle lowest, which is Faber-Krahn rather than a choice. How fast each overtone fades is material and air, so that stays a slider rather than a silent assumption.
The mallet is modelled too. Its width is a slider; its contact time is fixed at a few milliseconds, because no real beater is instantaneous and one that was would drive every mode equally hard. Both decide how much of a mode a strike can reach, and neither can move a mode's frequency. Damping is Rayleigh damping, so loss rises with the square of frequency: the high overtones die away first, which is why a drum darkens as it rings.
Eigendrum is hosted at eigendrum.com. That is the address to link to and to cite; the older baselashraf81.github.io/eigendrum is a mirror that now redirects there.
For advertising or partnership enquiries, write to u2679054@uel.ac.uk. For anything wrong with the maths or the interface, an issue on the repository is better, because then the fix is public.
No build step and no application backend: the mesh, the solve and the audio all run on your own machine. The deployed site uses Vercel Analytics, Google Analytics and Google AdSense, which is what pays for the domain and keeps this free to use. The shape you draw lives in the address bar after the #, which browsers never send to a server, and analytics is configured not to record it. Details in the privacy notice. Set in Jost* by indestructible type*. After Kac, Can One Hear the Shape of a Drum? (1966); Gordon, Webb and Wolpert (1992); and Driscoll, Eigenmodes of Isospectral Drums (1997), whose coordinates the two Kac drums use.
Source, including the solver and the tests that check it against the closed-form spectra: github.com/BaselAshraf81/eigendrum
Free to use, with no account and nothing to install. If you would like to put something towards it, or would rather it were not ad-supported: ko-fi.com/baselashraf