https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1877%E2%80%931878_El_Ni%C3%B1o...
In simple terms, the ocean surface anomalies are just the surface footprint of this massive subsurface warm core.No direct link, but click the "anomaly" map button just underneath the map. Hello all these similar 10+ °C anomalies that have sat around. Some colder spots too that have hung around! But yikes. https://climatereanalyzer.org/clim/t2_daily/?dm_id=world
But the biggest effect and this is noted by many insurance companies now is going to be in places like India.
But this is something the world has never seen and I mean that literally so I don’t expect it to be anything but really bad and you should be ready.
That being said, the existing energy crisis and fertilizer crisis can significantly compound the negative impacts of this El Niño even if we are able to anticipate it.
If these are the temperatures on the surface, think of the depths. There is a whole additional dimension to multiply (integrate) across.
The added energy is far greater than you might think simply by looking at the surface.
The article is so repetitive and padded out with empty prose that I found myself ignoring whole paragraphs. It's like the author decided to describe what an el niño is, then describe what an el niño is, then describe a super el niño, then describe what an el niño is, then describe what an el niño is, then describe what an el niño is, then describe the possible consequences of a super el niño, then describe what an el niño is, then describe what an el niño is, and finally describe what an el niño is.
If by “us” you mean big corporations, which will then buy the stuff and sell it at a premium later, then I agree.
I at least think of El Nino kind of running into South, building up in the Pacific. But the heat cuts across, then down, and pools in Antarctica here, is how I read it.
https://www.scribd.com/document/979965270/Robinson-Kim-Stanl...
Eg: the severe disruption of the jet stream or the collapse of the AMOC.
Plus all the long term feedbacks like methane etc.
In the UK and other European countries, I see every month we're breaking records on the percentage of power generated from renewables.
Check out https://www.energydashboard.co.uk/live - it shows the UK is currently generating 30%+ of it's power from solar, which is incredible.
People dying from extreme heatwaves, weather, and famines due to climate change has been predicted for decades at this point; and this is exactly the sort of climatic setup that will enable this to happen.
A single cow alone requires lots of crop, water, and produces tons of methane (which is 200 times more dangerous than carbon dioxide).
Fishing is another earth destroying endeavor. A single boat, a single one, practicing bottom trawling is more dangerous to the environment than the emissions of tens of thousands of cars. In a single day it can have the same impact of deforestation on an area big as a montain.
Seriously, stop believing the fossil fuels gaslighting. They are indeed a problem, but the cause for climate change is all of our toxic habits and our incapacity to say "enough", take the bus or eath healthier (for us and the planet).
An extreme swing, here and there, has always been part of its nature.
The observed change is more and more extreme swings, greater amplitude, higher frequency.
We're defiantly in the rainy side of the scale. https://climatecenter.fsu.edu/products-services/data/statewi...
As for this seasons storms in WCFL, every week I see storms that barely move - often just sitting in place for an hour or more. It's a change from the historical lines that marched across the state.
Corporations may indeed be taking advantage of this, demanding prices so low that the farmers don't get the benefit of those subsidies. However:
> buy the stuff and sell it at a premium later
Is the point of a futures market. Futures let people trade a thing before they even know how supply and demand will balance, guaranteeing a price for the producer and letting them plan purchases of machinery and maintenance, with the risks (in bad years) and profit margins (in good years) going up the supply chain.
And what would you rather happen? If they don't store up a surplus then everyone will run out of food and prices will go up anyway. If there is less food because of a drought, prices are going up. If corporations start building up a stockpile then prices aren't going to go up as much as if there were no reserves.
TLDR; Yes. Good. It is a great day when there is food available at the local supermarket.
There are ~200 countries, of course on average your country will be less than .5% of emissions. Thinking .5% is small enough to do nothing is exactly the kind of thinking that leads us to inaction.
So yeah, china and the US need to get their act together, but so does every other country.
Granted fossil fuels are much more ubiquitous than CFCs and comparatively more difficult to replace, but we have prior art for changing industrial practices in the interest of improving climate conditions.
https://www.weather.gov/hfo/faq
https://energy.ecoflow.com/us/blog/when-is-it-hurricane-seas...
And if it would be 42°C/107°F with fog and 100% humidity, lots of people would be dead already. But it’s more like saying “at least this building is not on fire right now”. Or 1km wide meteor is not crashing down. It is not, and anything near 40°C is really unpleasant, regardless of burning homes and falling meteors.
The rhetoric is all well and good, but if you look at the numbers according to the WMO[0], deaths from climate-related hazards have been dropping steadily in the 50-year period from 1970 to 2019, even as atmospheric CO2 went from ~326ppm to ~410ppm and the world population more than doubled. That's not a per capita decrease; it's an absolute decrease, from over 50k deaths worldwide the 70s to fewer than 20k in the 2010s.
All of this is due to the increased ability of humans to deal with what the climate might throw at them, mostly due to cheap energy unlocked by fossil fuels during that time. Remember, there are no countries that are both rich and have a low per capita energy usage. Surplus energy allows humans to build the infrastructure that makes them more resilient to disasters.
If I had to wager, more people will suffer and die in the coming decades from efforts to combat climate change (i.e. hamstring energy production and usage) than from climate change itself. You can already see this in the anti-air conditioning sentiment in parts of Europe.
Check a thermometer in the shade. The weather data stations reported an average of 101 ℉ / 38 ℃ for Waco. It's hot, and especially feels worse with Southern subtropical humidity. OTOH, 101 in California with 0-15% humidity, it would just be a bit annoying. Higher humidity makes heat qualitatively exponentially worse until it's a sauna.
Batteries have only recently-ish gotten energy dense and cheap enough for electric cars to be competitive, completely different solutions are needed for long distance shipping by sea or air.
It's the same situation across many other sectors like agriculture, construction and waste management. Lots of things causing emissions that's not electricity generation.
Why would you support a system that you recognize makes it impossible to do the right thing even as we're dying from its consequences?
The US is busy sending warships across the planet to blow up oil refineries which will be rebuilt. It's not bad enough we are busy grinding sand, but we are actively making things worse.
Republicans are the bad guys right now.
You step out of the shower and within minutes you're stepping back in for another.
in another hand, i question if we really could rule out, since back in the days, everything that we have was coal.
It's like being in a traffic jam and complaining about the other people in the traffic jam... Dude, you're one of them.
Your last claim makes no sense. Is there actually a widespread political effort to ban air conditioning or make it hard to get in Europe? That certainly isn’t the case in the US. And yet hot summers are still killer in cities which aren’t accustomed to them: that’s climate change doing the killing.
Solar is just about the most abundant source of energy on the planet, and easily decentralized. Plugin solar is becoming increasingly popular and cheap, for example.
I think energy production would be much more abundant and directly in control of the people if governments stopped subsidizing energy sources that need massive amounts of resources just to keep running. Why not give solar an advantage when every watt installed can just… work by itself for the next three decades? Every watt of a gas plant needs you to figure out who to buy gas from forever.
Though my version of capitalism isn’t the libertarian free market one, libertarianism will always evolve into oligarchy or something fascistic given enough time, it’s just baked into the incentives.
My personal ideology aligns with a managed capitalism, markets are created by an authority that ensures the incentives aligns with its overall goals. Mixed with very liberal social values.
I don’t know if that can survive overtime though. And that would very likely degenerate into something else when under stress.
As I said, I feel conflicted. But I appreciate the question
This isn't even true at a local level, let alone at the global scale.
We could have traditioned our grids off of fossil fuels but we also depend on them for fertilizer to feed the world and for transportation which, until very recently, didn't have a viable alternative.
The global amount of coal use in the 1880s was non zero, sure, but overall the CO2 emissions from those tonnages were minuscule compared to modern emissions within the past 50 years .. and we have direct libraries of atmosphere created since the early years of the Cold War and many pocket captures for the past 200 years, with proxies (such as ice core bubbles) going back far longer.
ENSO predates heavy coal use - so it's not something created by human activity, and as noted the first uses of coal were barely enough to move the needle (recall that collieries kept records so we have a fair handle on tonnages extracted).
But we also have recent history demonstrating that this will not be allowed to happen, no matter how much starvation there is in poorer countries, we WILL have our steaks. Not negotiable.
I'm sure he was referring to already food insecure places. The rich countries will have food available, probably at elevated prices.
In places where there's actual famine people will do crazy things to get their hands on food.
It's humid here (50-60%) but public spaces are all ice cold indoors. I'm just here for a graduation, fly out tomorrow.
All the while they vote and cheer for political parties that make warming worst.
You seem like a thoughtful dude, kudos.
I, too, have been struggling with what a more just system could look like.
Personally, some aspects of Yugoslav worker self-management appeal to me.
Basic idea is: Companies compete on a market, but theres no stock market. Companies <= 5 employees can be run however the founders envisioned, past that boundary the board and exec suite are required to be elected by the workers.
Combined with state grants and regulations to direct the overall direction of the economy, I feel like it solves for a lot of issues of shareholder capitalism without swapping them for a whole separate set of Commissariat problems.
Of course, the state itself wasn't democratic in Yugoslavia and it suffered from ethnic tensions that ultimately tore it apart. But we don't need to copy their setup wholesale.
Wonder how you'd feel about something like that?
Value for who? Value as determined by who?
> Finally please give chapter and verse for the 'dying'.
You're commenting on it right now. Rivers here are drying out. Glaciers are melting. Forests are burning. How long do you think we can keep going like this?
> Maybe compare the world of 2026 with that of 1900 and the quality of life for people in general and our concern for the life on this planet.
You can compare the results of those 126 years right here: https://static01.nyt.com/images/2023/01/23/learning/GlobalTe...
Regarding your quality of life claim, let me refer back to the burning forests, drying rivers etc. Would you call that an improvement?
Clearly, its not going great. And action is actively being sabotaged by the most capitalist major power: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/06/climate/trump-climate-int...
So how do we proceed with all this in mind?
How long can we keep optimizing for capital self-reproduction at the expense of the base conditions we survive on? The incentive structure does not allow for making the systemic changes required for continued thriving of humanity. What good is it then? How is it anything but a suicide pact?
But if trusted leadership told everyone that we were roasting the planet instead of telling them we weren't and that roasting the planet is un-American, you can bet your sweet ass we'd have some green and nuclear energy going by now.
I can think of a lot of countries where it wasn't a factor, maybe because if you are a rational economic actor trying to decide to throw money and messing with what people believe you can concentrate on just the biggest country that everybody does what it says. I mean what would be the point in convincing a large part of the Danish population that climate change wasn't real? It seems like it would be inefficient.
on edit: rational in this context is just using money in a way that maximizes the result one gets while minimizing the expenditure, in case anyone was getting ready with a clever rebuttal.
Air conditioning in buildings is likely viewed as a threat to gas providers as most modern cooling devices also have a heating mode that competes directly with gas heating.
Lots of people pat themselves on the back for (correctly) believing that climate change is real. Why is it so hard for people to also believe that regulatory capture and oligarchy are real, and directly responsible for the lack of action against climate change?
Think of all the for-profit power utility companies in the US. Why are they for-profit? For that matter, why are ISPs for-profit and not run as non-profits with heavy government assistance? Answer, basically: Because the existing people that make lots of money off them have been lobbying heavily to make it so. Similarly, it is no coincidence the current leadership in the US is actively against renewable energy.
A lot of the existing wealth, especially in North America and Europe was built on top of fossil fuels directly or indirectly (cars, power plants, industries, maintaining diplomatic relations with oil-rich nations). That dependence is hard to unwind and is going to take 50 years or more unless the US electorate can start electing people that believe in climate change. And for this reason, actually addressing climate change is going to come from unintuitive social actions, like making smaller housing more fashionable, moving to urban areas, possibly cracking down heavily on crime in those areas, and financially rewarding the use of public transport and bikes.
The fertilizer thing is a perfect example. We don't need to extract, refine, and burn nearly as much fuel as we do to get the fertilizer we need. People make the same empty argument about the cheap plastic shit that dominates the economy as if the world didn't exist before cheap plastic shit and couldn't exist after.
Indeed, though given Trump's behaviour I have wondered what will happen when it's poorer *US states*.
Fortunately, the farmers had a word and seem to have stopped the deportation of the undocumented (illegal) immigrants who do so much farm work.
Also fortunately, the reservoirs (that weren't even connected to where the fires in SoCal were) were not actually emptied, so my worst-case scenario at the time didn't come up: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_water_release_from_Lake_K...
Long may it continue that people who can say no to bad decisions, remain able to say no. Last thing anyone in the world needs with the Eurasian breadbaskets of Ukraine and Russia destroying each other's grain export capacity is the US shooting itself in both legs with an M134.
Can't think of many countries besides Canada and US that would not starve in NATO if such a necessity arose, and that's because they produce lots of cereals.
All the other countries in NATO are major food importers.
There are very limited options here. Those two are, by far, the two best ones for reliably being able to access food. Someone has to build up a reserve. Literally, you should to be able to point someone out and say "this person will give me food next month, they've got a stockpile for this drought".
Ideally that someone who is very, very motivated to get it right and make it happen. Those big corporations charging extra are going to keep people fed.
> The world is bigger than your relatives.
I offer no commentary on the size of my relatives vs. the rest of the world :)
Super El Niño continues to strengthen rapidly across the tropical Pacific, with new ocean and atmospheric data showing another acceleration in its development. The latest long-range forecasts have raised the projected peak again, pushing the 2026 event deeper into historic territory later this year.
Behind this rapid growth is an unusually strong combination of westerly winds and subsurface ocean heat. Recent data shows record-level westerly wind anomalies across the equatorial Pacific, while a powerful Kelvin Wave continues to spread eastward beneath the surface, providing additional warm water that powers the Super El Niño.
In this specialized forecast article, I break down the latest ocean and atmospheric data behind the rapidly growing Super El Niño, including the record westerly wind anomalies and changing long-range forecasts. I also look at how the atmosphere is already responding, and what the latest Fall and Winter 2026/2027 predictions show for the United States, Canada, and Europe.
In the past few months, we have been tracking the growth of a Super El Niño event that is already a major global weather driver for 2026/2027. This Super El Niño is growing rapidly, and with the forecasts constantly adjusting its peak strength higher, we have to monitor its development on a regular basis.
Currently, we have just entered a very strong El Niño phase, so below you can see the usual changes it brings to the atmospheric circulation. The upward and downward atmospheric motion and circulation in the tropical regions is called a Walker Cell, and is especially sensitive to strong ENSO events. Image by ESA.

In simple terms, the El Niño causes a pressure drop in the central and eastern tropical Pacific and a high-pressure zone over the western Pacific. This circulation change affects the global atmosphere and significantly influences pressure patterns, winds, rainfall, and the overall seasonal weather system.
While a moderate event produces a mild wave pattern, a Super El Niño triggers a far more aggressive shift in the jet stream. The transition from a Moderate to an Extreme El Niño leads to a deeper Pacific trough and a stronger Canadian ridge, forming an atmospheric highway.

This favors milder conditions in the north while driving an active storm track across the southern United States. The image above is from a study (linked below) that compared pressure anomalies at 5km (3.1miles) during Winter for moderate and strong El Niño events.
Below is my combined analysis image of the last 4 Super El Niño events, showing ocean temperature anomalies. You can see a strong warm anomaly across the central and eastern tropical Pacific. This close proximity to North America means direct and strong impacts on the seasonal weather in the United States and Canada in the Northern Hemisphere.

El Niño events happen every few years, but Super events are rare, and usually occur once per decade or less.
But how does an El Niño even reach a “Super” status? To keep it simple, a westerly wind burst can pile up warm water in the western Pacific. This creates a warm oceanic layer at depth known as a Kelvin Wave, raising ocean heat content in the western Pacific, spreading east, and rising to the surface.
The latest analysis data now shows the exact same process unfolding rapidly, but with an energy signature that exceeds most (if not all) previous super events.
The latest NOAA CRW ocean analysis below shows the ENSO area covered in substantial warm anomalies. You can see the peak warmth in the eastern parts reaching more than 5 degrees above normal over a large area, peaking at over 6 degrees anomaly. This is an exceptionally strong anomaly for this stage of development, indicating unusually rapid El Niño growth.

The analysis below also shows the 30-day ocean temperature anomaly change. It reveals a broad warming trend as the El Niño is emerging, increasing by more than 1.5 degrees over a very large area. Such a trend marks accelerated growth, with at least 3 months of further development ahead.

The unusually rapid growth can be seen in the latest analysis graph below, for the main ENSO region. This is based on the relative ENSO index, which normalizes the data across past decades, making all El Niño events directly comparable. I produced this plot using BOM weekly data.

As you can see, there has been accelerated El Niño growth and strengthening since Spring. The 2026 event has already surpassed the last Super El Niño event (2015-2016) in speed and strength. It is already not far from the peak strength of the last Super event, after having one of the fastest development cycles in decades.
Looking at the medium-range forecast below, the day-10 forecast shows continued expansion of the +5 degree (+9°F) anomaly area, indicating no real break in the current growth. The 2026 event is developing at an exceptional rate, with the latest data putting its current trajectory among the strongest in the historical record.

Exceptional surface anomalies are only half the story. The true power that is driving this rapid warming and Super El Niño development sits deep below the ocean surface.
Below you can see the subsurface temperature anomaly across the tropical Pacific in the top 250m (800ft) of the ocean. This reveals the core (engine) of the 2026/2027 Super El Niño event: a powerful downwelling Kelvin Wave, with peak anomalies over 9 degrees (16°F) above normal. It is pushing eastward and rising toward the surface.

In simple terms, the ocean surface anomalies are just the surface footprint of this massive subsurface warm core. As this warm water steadily surfaces, it provides a continuous supply of thermal energy to keep the El Niño strong and healthy well into the Winter season.
I produced a video below that shows the development of subsurface temperature anomalies in the past week under the ENSO region. It shows clear movement and growth of this large Kelvin Wave and its eventual rise as a Super El Niño in the eastern parts.
These subsurface Kelvin waves are driven by the westerly wind bursts across the tropical Pacific, pushing the warmer subsurface ocean waters to the east, where they rise to the surface. And there are more westerly winds coming to the Pacific, boosting the Super El Niño even higher towards Winter.
Below is the zonal wind ranking for June and July 2026, which I calculated using ERA5 data. It nicely shows how the westerly wind anomaly in the past two months compares to the past 86 years. You can see that a broad region of the western and central equatorial Pacific recorded its strongest low-level westerly wind anomalies on record, with surrounding areas ranking in the top five.

This is scientifically significant because achieving an absolute record across an 86-year dataset for a two-month average requires sustained, broad trade wind collapse. It shows that the atmosphere really is supportive for one of the strongest El Niño events to develop.
The result is visible in the ocean heat content below, which looks at the ocean down to 300m (1000ft) depth. It perfectly shows an expanding warm subsurface anomaly across the tropical Pacific and ENSO regions from Spring to now, driven by the westerly wind bursts that push the warm Kelvin Wave eastward.

But the story doesn’t end here, since continued westerly winds will help sustain and further strengthen the Super El Niño anomalies at and below the ocean surface.
Below is the latest analysis and forecast of the winds across the tropics. You can already see the strong westerly wind burst anomalies (warm hues) in the analysis part, driving the El Niño warming. But the forecast now also shows even stronger westerly anomalies across the Pacific in August, which will help further grow and strengthen the 2026/2027 Super El Niño event.

The extended-range ECMWF forecast maintains continuous westerly wind anomalies across the western and central Pacific through late September. In ensemble forecasting, a signal this persistent beyond 10 days indicates an exceptionally robust ocean-atmosphere coupling that will continuously suppress trade winds and force tropical Pacific warming.

The individual westerly wind burst events occur on a daily or weekly scale, making it hard for seasonal forecasts to simulate them properly. And since they are the key to El Niño growth and strength, this means the true extent of the 2026 Super El Niño event was hidden until recent weeks.
Because seasonal models cannot properly simulate individual future westerly wind events, they often underpredict the initial rapid growth of an El Niño. This is until the winds actually occur, launch an oceanic Kelvin Wave, and allow the models to physically see the resulting El Niño warming.
This has created a very strong visual forecast trend, with each new forecast showing a stronger peak El Niño anomaly.
Below is a comparison I produced using the last seven ECMWF forecasts, released since early February. You can clearly see that each new run shows a stronger event, with the last three runs pushing it into record-strong territory, above all the strongest Super El Niño events.

The same trend is also visible on the NMME multi-model forecast, also trending with a stronger Super El Niño with each consecutive run since February at least. The anomaly values for the main ENSO region now peak close to +4 degrees, making this a record-strong event if verified.

The term Super El Niño is commonly used for events in which sea surface temperature anomalies in the main ENSO region reach or exceed +2 degrees above the long-term average. All forecasts now indicate that this event will reach far above that, exceeding even the extreme +3 threshold (unofficial) in a lot of scenarios.
Below is the latest ECMWF forecast average for the November-December period, revealing a significant Super El Niño event. Peak anomalies reach +7 in the eastern parts, outside of the main region, but overall, we are observing a historic event unfolding.

El Niño events always peak later in the year, with the latest forecasts trending toward a max anomaly around November-December as seen above. The multi-model forecast below for November shows a very strong event, with the Super El Niño and related anomalies covering over 10% of the global ocean surface.

But the strong anomalies do not end in the ocean. The atmosphere is already responding to this El Niño event, with stronger impacts coming in Fall and Winter 2026/2027, as indicated by the latest long-range data.
To detect the visible atmospheric impact of the Super El Niño, we need to find its circulation in the Walker cell, the tropical rising and sinking of air.
Below is the latest 30-day analysis of the Velocity Potential parameter from GDAS data, which shows broad areas of rising and sinking air in the atmosphere. You can see a large rising air anomaly (teal) directly over the central and eastern Pacific, forced by the lower pressure and rainfall of the El Niño, and strong sinking (brown) towards the west.

These areas of rising and sinking air (Walker cell) are usually dynamic, moving around the globe with different atmospheric waves and drivers. But when a Super El Niño appears, the strong ocean heat and energy overpowers these moving weather drivers.
It can force the atmosphere to lock down, creating what scientists call an atmospheric standing wave. You can see this in the ECMWF extended forecast below, which shows the main areas of the Walker cell almost fixed/stationary over time, for the duration of the forecast into late September.

You can clearly see the two main areas of rising and sinking motion: Low pressure over the tropical Pacific and the stable sinking air over the Indian Ocean, which reveal the standing wave formation.
But just looking at two different colors doesn’t reveal the full picture. For that reason, NOAA has created the Multivariate ENSO Index (MEI). This index combines oceanic and atmospheric data into a single measure of the ENSO state. This reveals how strongly the El Niño signal is established across both the ocean and atmosphere.
You can see the MEI table below, which shows the bi-monthly value for 2026, compared to the last 3 Super El Niño events. The latest value shows that 2026 reached a record-high June-July (JJ) value of +2.4, the highest for this period in the NOAA record since it began in 1979.

Values above +2 are found only during the strongest El Niño events, but not this early. This confirms just how strongly the oceanic and atmospheric signals have already developed in 2026. The index underwent an exceptional +3.4 point jump in just four bi-monthly periods, climbing from a cool -1 in February-March to +2.4 in June-July.
This means the weather in your backyard is directly or indirectly connected to what’s happening in the tropical Pacific, no matter how far away you live.
With a historic 2026/2027 Super El Niño event unfolding, we are entering almost uncharted territory in terms of atmospheric impacts. The biggest impact in the Northern Hemisphere arrives during Fall and more in Winter, when the pressure systems are at their strongest.
The latest Fall pressure pattern forecast shows a much more evolved pattern than normally expected, looking more similar to an El Niño Winter signature.
You can see below that it shows a stronger-than-usual atmospheric impact in Fall already, due to the strength of this El Niño event. The key is a high-pressure anomaly over Canada, with the El Niño Pacific low, and a wave of low-pressure systems over the southern United States.

Further east, a low-pressure area sits over the North Atlantic, reaching into the UK and Ireland. This creates a pronounced westerly flow over the continent and brings a warmer southerly airmass rising towards the north.
This is really interesting to see, because it breaks the usual Fall El Niño pattern, and instead looks more like an El Niño Winter pattern, seen below. It has the same low-pressure area in the North Pacific, a high-pressure zone over Canada, and a low-pressure storm track across the southern United States and into the Atlantic, just as the Fall forecast above.

This really shows just how strong the Super El Niño global forcing is, already evident in the current Summer season with the formation of an atmospheric standing wave.
The temperature forecast below shows warmer temperatures over the northern United States and Canada under the main high-pressure area. Temperatures are mostly around normal in the south-central and eastern United States, due to a more persistent low-pressure storm track starting in the southern half of the United States.

This is the October-December period in the forecast, which covers the core Fall season and the early transition into Winter.
The precipitation forecast for the same period also shows a very evolved El Niño signature, with increased rainfall over most of the United States, especially in the southeast and east, due to the amplified Pacific jet stream. Drier conditions are forecast over the northwestern U.S. and southern Canada.

Over Europe, we can see the impact of the low-pressure area in the North Atlantic, bringing warmer-than-normal surface temperatures over much of the continent. Warmer anomalies are focused on the central, western, and southeastern regions, driven by the westerly and southwesterly flow.

The westerly and southwesterly flow from the Atlantic low-pressure area also brings in a lot of moisture, increasing precipitation potential over much of the continent. This is visible in the precipitation forecast (right), indicating above-normal precipitation over most of Europe.
All these forecasts show that we can expect a strong pattern evolution from the historic El Niño event. But the full strength forcing usually occurs in Winter, with the latest round of forecasts indicating a highly amplified Winter pattern.
The winter season is the most high-impact part of the year, and usually of most interest to most people. It also packs the most energy in the weather systems, making it the most impactful part of the year in a Super El Niño event.
Below is the very latest ECMWF pressure anomaly forecast, released in the past few days. This is the winter forecast for the December-February period, and it shows a strong El Niño forcing at play. The key parts are the deep low-pressure zone in the North Pacific and the blocking high-pressure area over Canada.

The forecast also shows a high-amplitude pressure pattern across the southern and eastern United States. This is aligned with a strong Pacific jet stream, the key component of a Super El Niño Winter. It’s worth adding that this period is 4-6 months in the future, but already shows such strong anomalies.
Such a pressure pattern translates into a sharp temperature difference between the United States and Canada. You can see above-normal temperatures under the high-pressure zone in Canada and the northern United States, also including the U.S. West Coast, and the Northeast.

The deep southern low-pressure systems allow cooler-than-normal temperatures across Texas, the Gulf Coast, and the Southeast. This is primarily driven by an active southern jet stream zone, which brings persistent cloud cover and rain.
As we move into mid-late winter, there are some indications of the Super El Niño pattern going into overdrive. The February forecast below shows a much deeper pressure wave over the United States for mid-late Winter, with the whole atmospheric wave shifted east.

This northern blocking is forcing a deep, highly active low-pressure zone from the Pacific straight through the central, southern, and eastern United States. In such a configuration, this signals a potentially colder-than-normal mid and late winter season over parts of the United States.
The corresponding temperature forecast for February shows a surprising cold anomaly over a large part of the United States, reaching up into southwestern Canada. This would make for a very interesting Winter season, as it could lead to potentially good snowstorm scenarios across the central, eastern, and northeastern United States.

I do have to add that this is just a recent developing trend, so it’s not a fixed forecast by any means. But it is a calculation based on real oceanic and atmospheric conditions. I will further monitor this development, especially since it is gaining support from other long-range predictions.
A Super El Niño pattern also strongly impacts the snowfall potential. When an active southern jet stream overlaps periodic cold air drops from Canada, it can shift the primary winter storm corridor farther south than usual.
Below is the latest ECMWF snowfall forecast, and it shows exactly this development. We can see reduced snow totals across the Northern United States and southern Canada, but above-normal snowfall potential across the Central and Eastern United States, and southeastern Canada.

Good snowfall potential is indicated across the Southwestern and Southeastern U.S., the Central Plains, parts of the Midwest, East, and into the Mid-Atlantic.
Areas across Canada, the Pacific Northwest, and the northern Great Lakes show below-average snowfall anomalies, driven by warmer temperatures and a northern ridge that pushes the polar air away.
The most important thing for snowfall is where the moisture flow intersects cold air. This forecast setup elevates the potential for major winter storms, ice events, and heavy snowfall from the Southern Plains and Mid-Atlantic into the interior Northeast. But it does rely on having a cold enough air mass to work with.
Below is the very latest winter pattern forecast by ECMWF. It shows the highly amplified pressure over North America, also impacting the weather downstream. The main feature for Europe comes from the low-pressure area extension into its northwestern and northern parts.

This creates a strong pressure difference from north to south, boosting the westerly flow into Europe from the Atlantic, while also allowing some northerly flow over the north and northwest.
This is reflected in the latest December-February temperature forecast below, where you can see mostly above-normal temperatures during the winter season. This is the result of a dominant mild westerly flow. It still allows some northerly flow into the UK and Ireland, as low-pressure areas move from the Atlantic into northern Europe.

The main snowfall potential in such a pattern comes with individual low-pressure systems moving further inland and to the south, bringing along a more northerly flow. The overall seasonal pattern is not that favorable for broad snowfall over Europe. The exceptions are the north and northeast, and the central higher elevations.

I will write full in-depth forecast articles for Fall and Winter 2026/2027 over the United States, Canada, and Europe, once all the necessary data is available.
Forecast and analysis images in this article are from ECMWF, CyclonicWX, weathermodels.com, and WeatherBell (using a commercial license).
El Niño driving the August weather shift: Super El Niño Drives an August Weather Shift as Fall and Winter Signals Strengthen
New ocean anomalies emerging: A New Ocean Anomaly Joins Super El Niño, Reshaping the Winter 2026/2027 Forecast
We will keep you updated on the global weather pattern development, so bookmark our page. Also, if you have seen this article in the Google App (Discover) feed, click the like (♥) or the star button there to see more of our forecasts and our latest articles on weather and nature in general.
The Boiler Upgrade Scheme grant also permits cooling - it’s based on the heating credentials of a unit only.
So in Britain at least, installing cooling systems in private residences seems to be getting easier.
Not sure it makes sense, most of those countries are already phasing out fuel/gas boilers.
IMO it's just cultural shift is slow to adjust (in those countries, a few decades ago AC would have been a wasteful luxury, summer temperature would be well below 30 except for a few days).
mMy phone tells me that the temperature this week has been 15°C above the long term average for this time of year.
Don’t really need air con when the peak temperature in the past has been 20–25°C
And I used that offensive word intentionally, because it fits perfectly.
Look around the thread at how people are treating each other, and then keep in mind that HN is probably like 99th percentile for civility on the Internet in this regard.
Look at what happens in threads about any other politically charged issue, for that matter. Heck, look how far the discussion will veer into politically charged off-topic matters, whenever the OP is about some meta-level "how to be convincing" "how to argue fairly" etc. point.
105m range on nimh which rapidly degrades isn't a fully viable car and a maximum of 1000 people "loved" it considering that's all they made.
GM is in business to make money. They didn't cancel a car that was a viable product.
The world is a lot bigger than the US and they've all followed pretty much the same trajectory the last two decades. A slow long term investment in R&D/manufacturing techniques, followed by increased adoption when it became economically competitive. Combined with varying levels of government incentives and measured regulation, to ease transitions so it doesn't destroy the economy which we still depend on for everything else.
These major shifts always happen slowly then start exponentially growing once it's demonstrated to be practical.
>If only China and US could get their shit together....
If people in the US are still consuming multiples more than people in other societies, then a decrease of 36% means the US still does not have their shit together. Presumably, zahlman's response of pointing out the 36% decrease was a refutation of fHr's claim for China and US to get their shit together.
Although, also funny is that the US's 36% decline is partly (significantly?) due to exporting CO2 emissions from manufacturing to China, but that applies to the rest of the world too.
Wars do not start by mutual agreement of all belligerents. If anything, usually the opposite.
Yeah, those pesky Ukrainians waging war for the pleasure of it.
Governments are also actors in this, and have incentivises on a different scale than "how much money this year?"; this remains true even when those governments are literally dictatorships, though as history has shown neither businesses nor governments (democratic nor dictatorship) are correct at all times, so it's nice we've also got super-national aid programs.
Stockpile food communally NOT through a big corporation making a tidy profit?
I know, to the US centric crowd at HN that probably sounds insane, but as a Scandinavian this is what I would have expected in the past (though probably not these days).
All apart from France, Netherlands, Spain, Denmark, Poland, Hungary, Lithuania, Turkey, Italy and Ireland.
Interestingly the US is borderline now depending on how you measure food imports and exports.
So who is going to be able to afford that bag of flour?
Further the African subsistence farmer has lost their harvest, so they don't even have that dollar.
The rich will always be able to outspend the poor. Making things uniformly more expensive doesnt change that. The west will continue to have an obesity epidemic while the poorest starve.
It's either for and by the community or it's for and by a big corporation profiteering off the misfortune of the community. It can't be both at the same time.
The big corporations aren't "going to keep people fed", they will hoard and ration by wealth, not by need. The billionaire will get their twenty course fine dining experience, the beggar will starve. That's not keeping the people fed by any serious definition of the term.
Unless stuff like "Why not give solar an advantage..." is a rhetorical question with the answer of "Because lots of current billionaires would make less money", I don't think they are pointing out the same stuff I said.
Not just taxes, §14 of the german basic law for example says:
https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/gg/art_14.html
Any property that is needed for the benefit of all (and where there is no alternative way to buy it normally etc) can be taken and redistributed.
So like a storehouse full of food, with a starving population and broken infrastructure - can be just taken and later compensated not with wartime prices, but "normal" ones. And I believe there are at least in theory some plans for that, which military trucks go to which warehouse and what are distribution centers etc.
Italy is not food self-sufficient, it relies heavily on imports of cereals, animal feed, oils, and other.
We add value up the chain (with hams, cheese, etc), but bar fruits and vegetables where we are okay-ish, we cannot feed ourselves. Its been decades that even our own pasta is made out of canadian and us cereals. We simply don't have enough, let alone we don't have good quality cereals.
On top of that, our production is super reliant on imported fertilizers and chemicals. We would borderline starve in case of isolation.
The average ribeye steak you serve in your barbecue joint can feed a family of 4 in war time.
It isn't like anyone would be unable to afford food, because a welfare state would imply a standing agreement to buy everyone food at the taxpayer's expense if required. And it is entirely reasonable for prices to go up when there is a shortage, the people who built up stockpiles in advance need to be compensated for their foresight. Someone has to be stockpiling food.
Not really. Corporations are social by essence, and on a much bigger scale than anything that came before. That’s precisely what makes socialism possible.
But what I'm suggesting is that a governments should perhaps build up such stockpiles again as we move into more uncertain and less peaceful times. This can help even in case of smaller regional disasters, not every emergency is a full blown war.
To be fair to past humans the deliberate lies and misinformation didn't really start until the 1970s, the oil crisis of that decade, the coming together of the UN to recognise the issue following the geophysics papers of the 1960s that nailed the CO2 problem against oil consumption, etc.
That's the period in which Koch money started flowing to think tanks and agencies that spun hard against smaller cars, public transport, integrated rail in cities, etc. The push for bigger cars as freedom.
Arrhenius' 1896 Model of the Greenhouse Effect didn't exactly have enough bite to kick of anti-prop in 1926, the world had other pressing issues.
Also worth noting that Three Mile Island was an earlier stain on public perception that kicked in a power station slow down well before Chernobyl.
Or we do what we've always done to war profiteers and hang them after taking their supplies, because hoarding food and expecting to be paid for it while people are dying is immoral and tends to get people a little bit pissed.
There's no fucking bet to be made that people will need to eat tomorrow, or have a house, or have water. Those are basic needs.
Why? And it's not foresight that sets those people apart, it's having the resources to hoard the food and the ethical framework that allows them to profiteer off their fellow humans misfortune. Why should we reward that?
> Someone has to be stockpiling food.
Sure, like a government or a coop or a commune or whatever. Some institution who's interests are aligned with the community, not somebody who happens to have capital and wants to make a buck.
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGjGsyMe_F8
* https://www.cbh.com.au/about-cbh/what-we-do
Thanks to being globally remote, easily isolated and events like WWII and COVID we're picky about having reserves (seed, fuel, grain) in storage to ride out <reasonable levels of shit happens>.
Corporations are transactional by essence, not social. Any relationship within or with a corporation has the singular goal of making the corporation money. Food deserts exist because corporations aren't social. Supermarkets and stores aren't there feed the community, they sell food only to those who can afford it, and only for a profit. If it comes down to it they'll station cops outside the store with shotguns to keep the poors away and let the food rot on the shelves because that's how capitalism works. That's the exact opposite of everything socialism is supposed to stand for.
Regarding the nuclear FUD, I'm not backing down. We'll never know how much the fear of nuclear was grassroots and how much was turf, but we can know for sure that someone didn't want Americans to have energy independence.
Didn't help that nukes didn't make good civil engineering tools or help conquer space by farting out tiny bombs.
Even Carl Sagan was pushing the nuclear should not be used primal back brain reaction by over hyping (?) nuclear winter for a disarmament argument.