> Although there is no direct evidence that the adaptation is linked to expanded octopus brainpower,
I.e. the entire connection between this mutation and octopus intelligence is made up. Not even a shred of justification.
I didn't realize that an octopuses brain was spread out all over its body.
We also have a nervous system distributed throughout our bodies, so we do experience the full body, but the neural signals are sent to one location, not nine. We experience ourselves as a unified hole, allowing exceptions for certain conditions.
Oh boy! Please hurry up with this. I want brains in all my appendages so I can adapt in real time to all the environmental conditions that I am encountering moment to moment.
Test it first though, maybe on a rat or a planarian. Your choice.
EDIT: I know this is great research. Understanding how evolution has allowed other species to adapt to their environments and overcome conditions that would be dangerous helps us assemble the pieces of the puzzle of the origin of life. I just don't think that the first thing we should be considering when we find something that makes an organism unique is the question of how we can insert genetic change into the human genome. If humans had ever needed it the mutation would already be present through natural selection.
If the end game is always to modify the human genome then there is no reason to do the research on other organisms.
Set up the conditions with humans and run a few generations through. The ones who make it likely have some genetic difference that predisposes them to winning that part of life. No need to rush things. Do it once, do it right.
Two other interesting aspects of cephalopods:
* Make many more changes to RNA than other invertebrates [2]
* Have only one type of light sensing cell in eyes, so may detect color by chromatic aberration
0. https://curtjaimungal.substack.com/p/peter-godfrey-smith-thi...1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Other_Minds:_The_Octopus,_the_...
2. https://www.sciencenews.org/article/octopus-squid-rna-editin...
3. https://news.berkeley.edu/2016/07/05/weird-pupils-let-octopu...
https://www.amazon.com/Other-Minds-Octopus-Origins-Conscious...
Mostly yes. But we do have some processing that bypasses the brain: reflexes for example. The classic example is the kick reflex that doctors test with a small mallet on your knee. Or when you blink as something flies towards your eyes. It happens and your brain gets informed afterwards.
But there are degrees of non-conscious processing, from the heart beating by itself and your guts doing their things, to the breath which will be on autopilot until you take control over it, to entirely voluntary things like moving about your limbs (for healthy individuals).
Maybe the octopuses experience their disconnected brains somewhere on that spectra, where the limbs are semi-autonomous unless it focuses on them? (All we can do is speculate, there is no known way to learn the qualia of being an octupus.)
For an octopus, it must be something similar but with all 8 of their appendages. Some specialize for hunting vs moving, so that’s at least easy to understand, but given they can act independently, I wonder if the octopus feels like the conflict between gut and brain with respect to food.
We justify everything we do.
Thank you for making me breath manually.
But say for farmed cows, living in a field for a while, that's better than not existing at all. You cannot judge if it's worth it from the cow's perspective, it got to live, enjoy the sun, eating in the field, doing cow stuff, same as us. Even with the hardships in my life I'd rather have existed, for however long I can, than not existing at all.
So you see it's not as simple to look at and judge farming. If it was for you those animals wouldn't even have experienced this reality. It some cases you may be right, depending on their conditions obviously.
Maybe your headcannon should be that apes did a "tower of babel" type thing to make all the octopus individualistic and unable to organize into a civilization
Conversely, farmed animals owe their existence as you say to our cultivating them. But where you see a moral release in that connection, I see a corruption of life into industrial inputs. A hunted animal many times will catch scent or sound and take flight, winning their life for another day. Livestock can't change their destiny by wit or will. Their entire existence is within the technological apparatus of our species.
The corruption becomes evident in evolution cleaved from the organism's interest and placed in service of our appetites. In turkeys with breasts too large to be able to balance standing up, let alone walk. Such animals can only reproduce by artificial insemination and only eat when food is placed directly in front of them.
Power dynamics such as these tempt us to tell just-so stories about lives well lived. Can we say for them that their lives are preferable to not existing at all? We're surely not neutral.
[1] - https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/octopus-city-obser...
I personally wouldn't eat meat if I had a good alternative. I rarely do, I eat it for health related reasons, considering my setup.
Almost all octopuses are cannibalistic but Abdopus have also been found living close to and tolerating each other
They don’t raise their offspring
![]()
Sara Hashemi | Daily Correspondent
August 19, 2026
![]()
Researchers made the discovery while studying the California two-spot octopus. Anik Grearson / Bellono Lab
Octopuses are incredibly clever creatures. They can open jars, solve mazes and even use tools. One species, the common blanket octopus, wields venomous tentacles ripped from the Portuguese man o’ war as weapons.
Now, researchers have discovered a mysterious mutation in some octopuses that might explain their intelligence. A study published in the August 17 issue of the journal Current Biology reveals that the eight-limbed creatures can produce proteins with extreme accuracy thanks to a variation never seen in any other animal. Although there is no direct evidence that the adaptation is linked to expanded octopus brainpower, only a lineage of creatures with enlarged nervous systems and that can carry out complex behaviors appears to have the mutation.
Scientists made this discovery by accident. About five years ago, study co-author Richard Han, then a graduate student at Harvard Medical School, was examining molecules called ribosomal RNA (rRNA) in tissues from the California two-spot octopus. The molecules create a 3D scaffold for ribosomes, the cells’ protein factories.
Many sequences of rRNA remain pretty much the same across all known animals. But Han noticed something unusual in those from the octopus: an unexpected gap that broke what’s usually one rRNA fragment in other creatures into two.
“We figured we were bad at extracting RNA” and simply had made a mistake, says study co-author Nicholas Bellono, a molecular biologist at Harvard, to Sara Reardon at Science.
Further tests, however, confirmed that something else was going on. Inserting the same break in the ribosomes of Escherichia coli bacteria made the engineered cells produce proteins with about twice their usual accuracy.
To examine when the strange rRNA feature evolved, the team compared two groups of octopuses that diverged more than 100 million years ago: incirrates, shallow-water octopuses with developed nervous systems that support complex behaviors, and cirrates, deep-sea creatures with simpler nervous systems adapted for slow swimming and passive feeding.
The rRNA break was present in all five examined incirrate species, the team found. But a sample from a cirrate—specifically, a dumbo octopus—lacked the gap. Squids, which diverged from octopuses about 300 million years ago, also didn’t have it.
Fun fact: Self-editing
Cephalopods, an animal group that includes octopuses, squids, cuttlefish and nautiluses, are masters of editing their own RNA—molecules that carry instructions from DNA to help build proteins. They do it far more often than other creatures do. In a study published in 2023, researchers reported that octopuses heavily edit RNA in their brains to brave frigid water.
The findings hint that the rRNA adaptation might be connected to the evolution of the shallow-water octopuses’ large nervous systems. Their brains—which are spread throughout their bodies—had to expand quickly as they learned to keep up with predators and increased competition in this environment. Nerve cells, or neurons, are long-lived, study co-author Rishav Mitra tells Scientific American’s Cody Cottier, which means protein misfolding is particularly bad for them. By preventing that, the rRNA break “might help these neurons to work well,” he adds.
“The major surprise is that the ribosome, which is highly conserved across life, can actually undergo evolutionary changes that impact function, and may even contribute to new innovations” study co-author Amy Lee, a cell biologist at Harvard, says in a statement.
Joshua Rosenthal, a molecular biologist at the Marine Biological Laboratory who wasn’t involved in the work, calls the discovery “super interesting,” although he notes that more research is needed to prove whether the rRNA change drove the evolution of sophisticated brains and behaviors. “We’re just getting to the beginning of genetics with these organisms,” he tells Science.
The study authors suspect their findings may lead to potential therapies for neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease that involve misfolded proteins in the brain. Lee tells Scientific American that she hopes that it will be possible to design drugs that copy the octopus mutation for accurate protein synthesis.
If we “use nature as a guide to understand how that happens naturally,” she says, “then we can probably find ways to put it into human cells.”
June 13, 2023
November 2, 2020
May 25, 2023
November 18, 2025
October 30, 2025
More about: